Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 22 May 2014 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459DF1A0125 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 00:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id edYiJwn4hPTT for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BE81A011F for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 00:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.153.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4M7fULR011812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 May 2014 00:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1400744502; bh=JBJh+oA4bdIB4MZaOTWCc+R0Skyii+3lThoPY9KOuQM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WBOPPSJC1DqtIw4a1s/Yzn8KQqP0A03rNfZbJQG1f87TSFBYlFeiTL3yKsrl4/CXz DSWjPuvl1fR47GhOHqhhtkfEMZEO301HzsR5HEry6uj+jLM5yFHv/zXHcD1PRBloLj W7uSXNMOJBzPq5mTZqJ94g+NzF+9JzoALieIfBCU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1400744502; i=@elandsys.com; bh=JBJh+oA4bdIB4MZaOTWCc+R0Skyii+3lThoPY9KOuQM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WwzcAyeNWls+qYHN1pVShA84p8MQwHy18NES7YZxCQp1F9jPGEue5LUi83k7mUQlx MRTX8L6dqKtPPWWJXmaUXZIew3s+x5WDEXCW8HNJ1DWpLgU7caOqbRR6RTbWrmz/jt Zb3XDJ0WNxh/EAqiyVYMBWITYMCt2vi2WRMt7T/c=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140522000414.0c5d5cc0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 00:39:00 -0700
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, ietf-privacy@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <031901cf7589$479266e0$d6b734a0$@huitema.net>
References: <02e501cf7573$c123ee40$436bcac0$@huitema.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521213233.0c503e30@resistor.net> <031901cf7589$479266e0$d6b734a0$@huitema.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/iayWT4zUSXKZj4Yk8bqeya-fjX0
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 07:41:55 -0000

Hi Christian,
At 23:44 21-05-2014, Christian Huitema wrote:
>Oops. That's what I get for trying the lottery. The UI just provides the RFC
>text, which in the case of 1108 does not present its status.

I found it worthwhile to read your review as it provides a sense of 
what to look out for.

>As I mentioned before, the lottery should only return RFC that are on the
>standard track and are not obsolete. Otherwise, we are wasting the
>reviewers' efforts.

The reviewer could choose one of the RFCs (in black) in the list at 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/categories/rfc-proposed.html

Regards,
S. Moonesamy