Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 22 May 2014 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE8E1A0179 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rfOvAfqnu70 for <ietf-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547A91A0162 for <ietf-privacy@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 02:34:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9565BE1D; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2f331GE6iXQ; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCF70BDCA; Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:37 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <537DC4AE.9010303@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:38 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, 'S Moonesamy' <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf-privacy@ietf.org
References: <02e501cf7573$c123ee40$436bcac0$@huitema.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521213233.0c503e30@resistor.net> <031901cf7589$479266e0$d6b734a0$@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <031901cf7589$479266e0$d6b734a0$@huitema.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-privacy/lvCoWglwGiDjS6fWYMAhxUqHTBg
Subject: Re: [ietf-privacy] PPM Review of RFC 1108
X-BeenThere: ietf-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Privacy Discussion List <ietf-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-privacy>, <mailto:ietf-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:34:44 -0000


On 22/05/14 07:44, Christian Huitema wrote:
> As I mentioned before, the lottery should only return RFC that are on the
> standard track and are not obsolete. Otherwise, we are wasting the
> reviewers' efforts.

Fair point. Also raised by Karen earlier. [1]  If people keep
using it, I'll add a button for that or something.

Cheers,
S.

[1] http://down.dsg.cs.tcd.ie/ppm/tweaks.html