Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Sun, 22 March 2015 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A771A6F12 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUUHOlY6rDBo for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF7C1A6F03 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 15:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BA7FA0168; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:22:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1427062923; bh=x2jNfs627gzH+CJQr8JMivuGeCDtDvspbkYk02Tl0tk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gR2AhdETsdKn4QyCAv4HAubNZZHcXD5urfzGANzrmqjIfabqvGTYaCY5Ui1mvXOBb Wsw8yE/F0SpPPK6b84vCK41SLH8D0k+SqIFEjJvZaetsIwDZqu2muUJkcmd939UNkW V8zGKNjJA8+ZfqjKYQskoBRxwa4A328vGjBZT7wM=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1427062821-8028-8027/11/6; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:20:21 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:20:20 +0100
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <259d7567-2b13-46df-bb03-54f74fc9e1b4@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <550F2851.2010409@isode.com>
References: <20150307202540.13358.58739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <550EE444.4040507@isode.com> <4175cf7b-c14e-455d-bd6b-0903d9de6194@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <550F2851.2010409@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ExCZ-NCwhuOLL3gM7Mzdaf9JsfI>
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:22:07 -0000

Alexey Melnikov writes:
> I think support for RFC 3030 CHUNKING extension is much more 
> common these days, but I need to double check major SMTP server 
> implementations.

Neither Exim nor Postfix. What else counts as major or common nowadays? 
Gmail perhaps? It does chunking, but not binarymine.

Arnt