IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Mon, 23 March 2015 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E153C1A8823 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U52fNTcT3ao7 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.159.242.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672DF1A8820 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PJX8XC7F9C00EVGI@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf-smtp@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1427086693; bh=m7Cb2d3jk53vMDtFWI66DK/ncdex7c2spr72YkU/LHI=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To; b=ZLdqdZtqFRFo6ZTH9QhL7kxpJ416gzRajCZ4YTvcBhnL1sR3pyMjXwj4m9Nl6vkwg Qq9xjjawWsctECvvxq52o6JQegRzzrTvsBSvvQgkBCsk5a55falCCqY1/n7TG3t1A2 qMTfM+8OVl+POvOyLvK05StH7W9hIDZshI7ZKMQE=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01PJX2UQ9NDS000090@mauve.mrochek.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01PJX8XAIWS0000090@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:54:49 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sun, 22 Mar 2015 23:20:20 +0100" <259d7567-2b13-46df-bb03-54f74fc9e1b4@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <20150307202540.13358.58739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <550EE444.4040507@isode.com> <4175cf7b-c14e-455d-bd6b-0903d9de6194@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <550F2851.2010409@isode.com> <259d7567-2b13-46df-bb03-54f74fc9e1b4@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/Mg3HZYArSijeQhhTHRTA2V9tC7I>
Cc: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 05:03:17 -0000

> Alexey Melnikov writes:
> > I think support for RFC 3030 CHUNKING extension is much more
> > common these days, but I need to double check major SMTP server
> > implementations.

> Neither Exim nor Postfix. What else counts as major or common nowadays?
> Gmail perhaps? It does chunking, but not binarymine.

FWIW, we support client/server chunking but our binarymime support is server
only. (The logic here is that it's main use is for mobile client submission.)

It support calls are any indication there are several widely used chunking
implementations out there. (With some bugs.) Binarymime, not so much.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email