IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Tue, 24 March 2015 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B15E1A86FE for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3e94PFJC6Fe9 for <ietf-smtp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [80.244.248.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6591A86F6 for <ietf-smtp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610A3FA00D3; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1427205284; bh=8BaVvnLqVydWdcmgKpbaqgfq21hyA9gHONMDh1cLPVY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZSGm6s3oK9uPHJvuSZv/34GyMi/5Jexj5qN4e0jV7A8yE+saN9ToOBIG8m8wmKUNu sx1plrgzHv1a263EO3U3Hia6eO9i8+1U0kR4Hhs+YqSP2QcEK4ENQuCSaI1JL1df/R iVh3m5UAOrN4FkouxbI/GZnGF3zHKAwOc1A8zQOE=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1427205282-31136-31135/11/2; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:54:42 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:54:42 +0100
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <bc63804d-8903-41e7-a6f4-5aa58471d787@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <01PJZ5MHFIS40000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <20150307202540.13358.58739.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <550EE444.4040507@isode.com> <4175cf7b-c14e-455d-bd6b-0903d9de6194@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <550F2851.2010409@isode.com> <259d7567-2b13-46df-bb03-54f74fc9e1b4@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <01PJX8XAIWS0000090@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABa8R6sQ1MCpYLW7NzwJTiVdWFgFOBEEx7GxJxJL71p+FBfsgg@mail.gmail.com> <01PJZ5MHFIS40000AQ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/jnbEa69tmCdxYALo2_B-vdxp6YA>
Cc: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>, ietf-smtp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-smtp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smtp-metadata-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-smtp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Simple Mail Transfer Protocol \(SMTP\) \[RFC 821, RFC 2821, RFC 5321\]" <ietf-smtp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-smtp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-smtp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp>, <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:54:48 -0000

Ned Freed writes:
> Of course another way to look at it is that this is Yet Another Way that
> DKIM/DMARC is incompatiable with our existing standards and infrastructure.
> Calling for Yet Another Fix.

Perhaps. Although in this case I suggest that BINARYMIME isn't part of our 
existing standards and infrastructure, for lack of implementation and 
deployment.

Arnt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email