Re: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 03:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDCE21E80E0; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:39:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.69
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.909, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ysr89NXqADSb; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E2521E80D4; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,637,1378882800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="110030415"
Received: from vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2013 19:39:50 -0800
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.51]) by vmwexceht03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.241]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:39:50 -0800
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "88attendees@ietf.org" <88attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson
Thread-Topic: [88attendees] Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson
Thread-Index: AQHO2ONr/m5FOh3ENk6zKUhYvqhTmJoWXTKAgAAocoA=
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:39:48 +0000
Message-ID: <5FB59788-EB16-479B-AE4F-F7FAEDE1403A@netapp.com>
References: <211BE376-9766-4024-9443-304336C6C14D@ietf.org> <5B327ED3-D756-421D-AA1A-62DF0057243C@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <5B327ED3-D756-421D-AA1A-62DF0057243C@cdt.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7ECD1F93-4C59-4947-80F8-CC4C323E47D5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 03:39:56 -0000

On 04 Nov 2013, at 17:14, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
> We are writing to thank the IESG and others who were involved for establishing an anti-harassment policy for the IETF. We support the policy, the IESG's authority to issue such a policy, and the creation of the ombudsperson role.

Fully agreed!

Lars