Re: The Friday Experiment

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 14 November 2018 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888171271FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:14:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Rryc2hzFMdN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B8A124C04 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1gMld0-00037B-8J; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:14:06 +0000
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:14:04 +0900
Message-ID: <m27ehgz6yr.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: The Friday Experiment
In-Reply-To: <B765E1CA-6131-4A7C-9C36-63CEF4DBA69C@vigilsec.com>
References: <CAA=duU3zuYXH58mpBs0wHDkz6=25At0ekV-1KKM-LTn=68c6WQ@mail.gmail.com> <cd9b121b-9dad-f9de-16f9-d719f9760832@cs.tcd.ie> <CECBC9E2-00A9-4771-BD0E-66117570491B@eggert.org> <B765E1CA-6131-4A7C-9C36-63CEF4DBA69C@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-9FzilzgdWhPlX2by-nOT3_B7zg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:14:11 -0000

> Joint activities with IEEE 802 were scheduled before the IESG
> announced the Friday experiment.  Anyway, even if it was known, the
> point was to use the weekend between the IETF and IEEE 802 meetings to
> allow participates in both communities to collaborate.

the ieee/ietf thing worked for me.  friday holiday did not.

randy