IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 November 2018 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93AD12F295 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:39:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSTnvVmNnV52 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F86130E2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id a77so2195034oii.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:39:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YIBjOZ/XqDgIOe3zeeG2kaXy183RBGrnzDpSeU3Kza8=; b=MHX34OEjCPhFKbjK8YMBd0aSazMDMItKH8iyOVd0glNyr/ofYKQZYEcAeJFMQjg58a 7Nj5G95dzJkwoGOTt8iMKVLZrKSYCJ6vrtfTQYQYcRV5+KjPMqx5wEVyhtlcxXKoCwiv Qmfe0Pk3ivLdq5IBT8Gl/j/4Wf71US0bK8HbaDcuZ5qu+MCKXj0p+g8Lqb7d7NTBCWRd 4oENNvGinVL85EKzwCKEhUgdem3EGioaGVqTL3TkwbKkwExVecMc+zCBraG2hTWxT2Es PVUnoEoNiUbmbrPUwJTwKBDyqEhDsLQ7OyxSy1jJHVI7e6C/c36oRldI5N9aFln+1U0x UvyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YIBjOZ/XqDgIOe3zeeG2kaXy183RBGrnzDpSeU3Kza8=; b=tAY+/MyCohw6QSbSdzYF/BFfiZV8tgOOKH5bDAnHUwc1VNhZ1I6C2yqtHTs6Vc0CsU xv+klhNQgkRLwYcmdOnopWbgbYt68G+QN/WL89DPYeQ+N0YMmaM4zFT3CUKKM2QzFser 3Y2puqIlXVnLtP5iNGF3SzqRa+tWWVblnOtv8yKtxz4wUf7zMBia25Me4aku6PDyBpHf c/ZeIwh7Q4+BxTOgMhJp9TA++VwMLGOlfsFNh5Q0NN4lF1UM9UUu9Y5EtO3DvxHW9VLc syM6tBp9HmSsDHpCOTxI8Rl0h84YZxH0CzeNdUHg9QTqo5k9+omWKWriPujgIz/K9u7Y IIcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJubvpzIOPg5QHch4O7x9V3wnETk5De4mr9ldHXKaYBjImAX2CQ hchgXTbY/VRc58AWsPZJlh30vgGeyfh6OWGcpXA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e7BCfzhXsmAfHSnmHBI29po7NeoLlEQhRU27Tr/8YfcmnrqVH2CTMiyS2mfg84Q15VYQpA4Ig/kQGLs8LcsEo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5058:: with SMTP id e85mr1523669oib.111.1542735578448; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:39:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA=duU3zuYXH58mpBs0wHDkz6=25At0ekV-1KKM-LTn=68c6WQ@mail.gmail.com> <AF41FE93-E6F7-498B-B973-820E8AB2C387@cooperw.in> <0591292b-97d5-31da-9a6d-e1178103648e@labn.net> <EDBE750E-B17A-4C1A-9433-9C30272CF08B@nohats.ca> <CAPt1N1nZENQTqgCHEkHg_RM5ipY_-Ge8LJtrzpGK95b7K7xwLQ@mail.gmail.com> <44EB8D7D-42A7-4585-AEB4-195636973A11@eggert.org> <CABkgnnU=7Exp=F-7ibWJr5B7AE=+G-a307MM0-22s9zr8ULVtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACpbDcf=znRFrAXkJJV+cKg79A=UWRoF9FBLm8s0XZi8vzPjLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMDGJ4EckVjtMHnjWu--khJ7LfWtR=9hgEw0n-b-syK0w@mail.gmail.com> <B0E40E6A-7E84-43AA-9FB6-4A78A11A0C2E@cisco.com> <CFBDAF27-E81F-49EA-81BF-7C2E68D68389@nohats.ca> <607960FF-DB2E-4A4A-B430-4375B40A633F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <607960FF-DB2E-4A4A-B430-4375B40A633F@cisco.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:39:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6uqU_NSMZ4KNe37k-FxWMd60=-S+nX1S9df-DdDZhVkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment)
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022ca14057b1c1ed5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/I81kEYbD9Ho_RuzRWWwps0srpjU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:39:42 -0000

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:11 AM Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com>
wrote:

>
>
> *From: *Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
> *Date: *Monday, November 19, 2018 at 6:11 PM
> *To: *Charles Eckel <eckelcu@cisco.com>
> *Cc: *Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, "
> ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Hackathon (was: Re: The Friday Experiment)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 05:17, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>  At IETF 102 and 103, we announced each time and had them raise their hand
> to show where they were. This took a few minutes at most. Are you saying
> this is not helpful?
>
>
>
> It is especially for Newcomer’s I guess. But also nice to know what is
> happening. Although I don’t think I have ever been at the start of a
> hackathon to see these.
>
>
>
>
>
>  At the end of the hackathon, we had 3-minute presentations by all teams
> that wished to share a summary of what they did. This is entirely optional,
> yet most teams chose to do it. It took about 90 minutes, which is
> admittedly a long time.
>
>
>
> There were 30 teams?
>
>
>
> An idea would be to have a max of three slides. What is the project worked
> on in 1 slide, what was the goal, what was achieved.
>
>
>
> Yes, about 25 or which presented. Each had 3 minutes and generally
> presented what you suggest here. Transitions between teams makes a bit of
> time as well.
>
> At IETF 101, I proposed not having these presentations, but when I polled
> the room the vast majority of participants raised their hands in favor of
> having them. These presentations are a way to record and share what was
> accomplished and learned at the hackathon. I believe this is valuable, even
> if not every presentation is of interest to everyone in attendance.
>
>
>
> Yes I agree. My earlier comments was only about disliking the contest. I
> do like the short presentations.
>
>
>
> Great, and thanks for sharing your thoughts. The hackathon continues to
> evolve as it grows. Constructive feedback and suggested improvements are
> welcome and valued.
>

I have gone in toward the end just to see some of the presentations so I
would know what WGs were implementing or testing for the ones I was
interested in seeing.  I can see the point that 90 minutes is long, but
there is some value in it.

Best regards,
Kathleen

>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> Paul
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email