Re: The Friday Experiment

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 14 November 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990B3130EB7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:10:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGo2gQD39x2U for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91C2130E5D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC8B20072; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E0ED6BE5; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0F0BD8; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: The Friday Experiment
In-Reply-To: <57F906B1-AAD0-4930-840B-7166B41FE305@tzi.org>
References: <CAA=duU3zuYXH58mpBs0wHDkz6=25At0ekV-1KKM-LTn=68c6WQ@mail.gmail.com> <cd9b121b-9dad-f9de-16f9-d719f9760832@cs.tcd.ie> <CECBC9E2-00A9-4771-BD0E-66117570491B@eggert.org> <B765E1CA-6131-4A7C-9C36-63CEF4DBA69C@vigilsec.com> <506EA2AA-F71A-4F2E-971E-15A8A432096A@vigilsec.com> <12455.1542205832@localhost> <57F906B1-AAD0-4930-840B-7166B41FE305@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:51 -0500
Message-ID: <10388.1542211851@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iXSmrGTC689Lee5qaBY9hP_nWOw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:10:57 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> That's a great idea, but if we do this, then we need to move the Hackathon
    >> into the intervening weekend, and basically move everything towards the end
    >> of the week.

    > I don’t understand — for those who want to go both to hackathon and the
    > IEEE joint meetings, this is a non-starter, and for both those that do
    > and those that don’t, the arrangement in Bangkok was perfect.

It's just too long to be away, and fails to bring the IEEE people
into the Hackathon.

Imagine we moved the Hackathon to Thursday starting at 5pm (to 9pm)
[because it as you said, it takes a bunch of time just to setup], all of
Friday, and then into Saturday. (and maybe even Sunday).

The Hackathon doesn't have to be *contiguous* for everyone, and one can
wander off to 3-4hr joint meetings easily in my opinion.

{I acknowledge that there is great value in having the Hackathon before the
IETF WG meetings}

Another idea is to have IEEE followed by Hackathon followed by IETF.
That might make both of us happy?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-