IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The Friday Experiment

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 14 November 2018 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544D130DD7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KkLOgv0Z10yI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C572512F1A6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id u9-v6so17967864wrr.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:21:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=qUFwTTZpVwefvRIX+mZ1UWxpjKCJY/yvf5AWwS+W9bg=; b=HlGoz+MsBjkP2/b7r3R4IEbzvISNKec0TUgy1uHTd8ZanHaarKOlBr8mHKG6WJhFLI 9EEOLMAixIFZAbdvVrfN/8J/nPaQNkhx4YyCqXfXnO9zD4MHkqJDiQ74d90eJ8W+Ovb+ WMGPX3LJGdvfPEbTTDOTuQXkagdgl9Dc48/wOGu9KrA8Dgz9gCRXool5HWYo4wlXshKI WwpqgJ4hr2ms9qEXJ8gvnePzgC0K+9VgJ8HTsxUu82z1l3ImF3iJMIpw73yYWbkqhTOf dcuOqcDZhrwNiZvSjrTI+BhdPMsXAHLdgXqM+MWjainwxx2PR4Lb/8sqVV8JQDg+j17p qzew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qUFwTTZpVwefvRIX+mZ1UWxpjKCJY/yvf5AWwS+W9bg=; b=JpvpGaLMMGQsFs8u804PDuzyD0clNy5YqMMDloxVF/KzYGIH9Gzjk+YrVnfSmkhDbL AsfLn9/RvyL8YN/fSO8laybgCY5fCJLGDo/wfuVsW6kK7+E3NtdYc76mlaIBrWk+U/cP NPOGeX3JopOFeYaNFQad5PQexN/6ujKJ+nV3OQL71nkpTYC0iEWMqp+qo6BtSsnzCbpG CSpo2IwPpLpFB45Yiio+KUgXVuj6xPKM02bnReyiJvZjnkvpw5DlBOlpcZZAqJebtZeQ t2sDhvjxeUDceecx3bUG/CxolUXifKcUuBoFgx/aLLMeJDSP5o6thAGZ9n/g7EcmNEhf KtLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ2OmSedrPR2fw4Jqy5DEgOVuX4EyiXlP7eBRfrJQGS/83IS0c3 l2xs1GQWsaNVRH5EVruy05ntszEmNCbCr7zLeAXF82z8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dYi7lX9LUprmQ6JQJ/mU55cEYpzaxvIIXQ1p3X8pQ6xn+FvBkk37afvCMxNzhv1b6l5rrhdGyflXtGBjej/ZA=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:650c:: with SMTP id x12-v6mr2579956wru.150.1542212462156; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:21:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA=duU3zuYXH58mpBs0wHDkz6=25At0ekV-1KKM-LTn=68c6WQ@mail.gmail.com> <cd9b121b-9dad-f9de-16f9-d719f9760832@cs.tcd.ie> <CECBC9E2-00A9-4771-BD0E-66117570491B@eggert.org> <B765E1CA-6131-4A7C-9C36-63CEF4DBA69C@vigilsec.com> <506EA2AA-F71A-4F2E-971E-15A8A432096A@vigilsec.com> <12455.1542205832@localhost> <57F906B1-AAD0-4930-840B-7166B41FE305@tzi.org> <CAJc3aaN3hp5QNhrCF2oxOctqrHEyoTYEBtjA=cZh8kDHb6UPGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJc3aaN3hp5QNhrCF2oxOctqrHEyoTYEBtjA=cZh8kDHb6UPGA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:20:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcc3Ld2nN1b1t1bTxk6+C3okDVBCv4uHvtZdKW5hZHqphQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The Friday Experiment
To: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f9a35f057aa25119"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yLvc9l_SUXvWxO7IRktq3GiEq8M>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:21:06 -0000

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:15 AM Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> wrote:

> I found the experiment to be valuable - we did learn a few things.
> Since perfection is not the goal, I think trying to understand how we
> would function with a reduction to four main days was worthwhile.
> That said, it appears the downsides (we seem to not deal well with the
> compressed schedule well) may outweigh the upsides.
>
>


> My personal opinion is that the main goal of the face-to-face meetings
> is to meet face-to-face.  So attempting to knock off a day seems to
> not be worthwhile if it means we risk significant overlap and
> conflicts for the days we are at the IETF.    I guess for those who
> don't want to be away from home too long, we just need to accept that
> it's not going to be prefect.   I know other organizations seem to
> often have some flex to end early to allow folks to get home before
> the weekend starts, but sacrificing the main point of getting together
> (to get work done) - does not seem to be the right compromise.
>
>
+1 for returning to the previous timing and also not changing it at all.

Behcet

> regards,
>
> Victor K
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email