Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was: Re: Last Call: draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt]

Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie> Thu, 10 May 2012 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@inex.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E44A21F8527 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1gouJSDuCsz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.acquirer.com [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E5121F8483 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: <ietf@ietf.org>
Received: from cupcake.local ([IPv6:2001:1bb8:2004:100:c94:487f:4ca3:7417]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4ACkwSe075388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:46:58 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@inex.ie)
Message-ID: <4FABB8E1.6040604@inex.ie>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:47:29 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues [was: Re: Last Call: draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt]
References: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FAA140B.4010703@gmail.com> <4FAAD14F.40009@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120509150640.090d7098@resistor.net> <AEFA3A3E-F672-4522-BCF9-5D75DC82D112@cisco.com> <4FAB2563.3090309@qualcomm.com> <4FAB643C.108@gmail.com> <4FAB92BF.8090408@isdg.net> <4FAB9EB4.8020704@isdg.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FAB9EB4.8020704@isdg.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
X-Company-Info-1: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited. Registered in Ireland No. 253804
X-Company-Info-2: Registered Offices: 1-2, Marino Mart, Fairview, Dublin 3
X-Company-Info-3: Internet Neutral Exchange Association Limited is limited by guarantee
X-Company-Info-4: Offices: 4027 Kingswood Road, Citywest, Dublin 24.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:47:34 -0000

On 10/05/2012 11:55, Hector Santos wrote:
> Always looking for automated solutions, perhaps the IETF I-D submissions
> process should include a patent database query check using document
> authors, document titles, abstract, keywords etc to find possible exact or
> near filings made, and if any are found, it can report immediately at the
> web site and/or send as part of the I-D submission confirmation message,
> something like so:

The world is a large place.  If this process is implemented, it might also
be wise to search other large patent offices.  In order of population size:

- China Patent and Trademark Office
- The Patent Office of India
- European Patent Office
- USPTO
- Japan Patent Office

A more complete list can be found here:

http://www.wipo.int/directory/en/urls.jsp

The european and chinese patent offices would seem to be of at least equal
significance to the USPTO, on the basis that they are the relevant
intellectual property agencies for the #1 and #3 global economic powers.
Japan comes in at #4.

This will create Interesting Problems in terms of getting appropriate clue
to search chinese and japanese patent databases.

Nick