IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 10 May 2012 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA7D11E80EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHbuJA4zvfV5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561C611E80AF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 20:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.9] (unknown [216.17.175.160]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F22040058; Wed, 9 May 2012 21:45:19 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4FAB362E.8050503@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 21:29:50 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
References: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FAA140B.4010703@gmail.com> <4FAAD14F.40009@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120509150640.090d7098@resistor.net> <m2ipg4zuoj.wl%randy@psg.com> <4FAB2A79.3090402@qualcomm.com> <m24nrozq83.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m24nrozq83.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 03:29:58 -0000

On 5/9/12 9:09 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

> i hope that this is not a witch hunt.  that it is not
> creating courts and guillotines.  we should assume people want to act in
> a responsible fashion and provide simple gentle paths to be taken when
> that assumption fails.

Well, draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions is the stick here, whereas
draft-polk-ipr-disclosure is the carrot that we hope will make it more
likely that folks will indeed act in a responsible fashion.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email