IETF Logo Mail Archive

URI listing (was: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues)

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 10 May 2012 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6E821F86F6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -92.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-92.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-9.998, BAYES_00=-2.599, URIBL_BLACK=20, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fux6-1j8+M-v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FCF21F86E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4AH0Dpp005477; Thu, 10 May 2012 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120510092502.0a6408f0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:53:20 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: URI listing (was: Leverage Patent Search API to reduce BCP79 related issues)
In-Reply-To: <4FAB9EB4.8020704@isdg.net>
References: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FAA140B.4010703@gmail.com> <4FAAD14F.40009@qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120509150640.090d7098@resistor.net> <AEFA3A3E-F672-4522-BCF9-5D75DC82D112@cisco.com> <4FAB2563.3090309@qualcomm.com> <4FAB643C.108@gmail.com> <4FAB92BF.8090408@isdg.net> <4FAB9EB4.8020704@isdg.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:00:22 -0000

At 03:55 10-05-2012, Hector Santos wrote:
>http://hector.wildcatblog.com

The above URI is listed by uribl.com.  Changes to mail.ietf.org will 
not fix the problem as it doesn't change the behavior of message 
filters on the recipient's side.

In case it is not clear, no action is requested from ietf.org. 
Messages from the sender with such content will still be distributed 
to IETF mailing lists and will still appear in the IETF mailing list archives.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email