Re: Copyright Confusion (was Re: IAB/IETF standardization process)

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp> Thu, 11 November 1993 11:05 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01761; 11 Nov 93 6:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01754; 11 Nov 93 6:05 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05113; 11 Nov 93 6:05 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01743; 11 Nov 93 6:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01703; 11 Nov 93 6:04 EST
Received: from necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05030; 11 Nov 93 6:03 EST
Received: by necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (5.65+/necom-mx-rg); Thu, 11 Nov 93 19:58:39 +0900
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <9311111058.AA16886@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: Copyright Confusion (was Re: IAB/IETF standardization process)
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@skidrow.lkg.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 19:58:38 -0000
Cc: ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: <9311091547.AA16697@skidrow.lkg.dec.com>; from "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" at Nov 9, 93 10:47 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

> My understand is that if you
> have any of those rights in any part of a work, you are justified in
> putting your copyright notice on it.

As long as the attached copyright statement covers your work only,
you can, which is not the case.

> And even for
> the other material, created by the persons writing the main text of
> the RFC, the fact that ISOC has the explicit right to grant the right
> to prepare derivative works, for example, justifies a copyright
> notice.

You are completely wrong, here.

> I certainly trust Vint Cerf that all this has been gone over with
> a fine tooth comb by lawyers.

It's an Internet Draft. If you trust Vint, you don't have to read the Draft.

But, don't say I should not comment on the Draft.

> Repeating: if you have any rights in any part of a work, you are

You should not repeat garbages. Read related laws, instead.

						Masataka Ohta