RE: Another last call for draft-weil

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Tue, 14 February 2012 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19621F86B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:25:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6syqlcsSfOmf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D2A21F866D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTzqnIeLD8d4zYUsR56vzTrxsUTLA3lNX@postini.com; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:25:45 PST
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:25:07 -0800
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:25:06 -0500
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:25:05 -0500
Subject: RE: Another last call for draft-weil
Thread-Topic: Another last call for draft-weil
Thread-Index: AczrN4nyqVHz1qmbSsm97A2pGasTHwADmhPg
Message-ID: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <CB5E9FDF.4DCE%c.grundemann@cablelabs.com> <2F5AF14A-BC87-4F34-BCB6-842F5722A1F2@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <2F5AF14A-BC87-4F34-BCB6-842F5722A1F2@delong.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BDEMBX01WFjnprn_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e4081efb-6d29-443c-8708-750833aec629
Cc: "draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org" <draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:25:46 -0000

+1.

Ross

From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:06 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org
Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil

I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to move forward and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN allocate the space already.

Owen

On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:


Fellow BDGKS Authors,

FYI: draft-weil is in another Last Call following an update that was requested by IESG Ads (on their December telechat, some ADs asked us to turn our request into a request for more 1918 space, but with a few caveats to home router manufacturers about not breaking when exposed to a CGN environment.). At this point we don't expect to change any minds. Basically everyone who is against the draft has spoken up. Now it is just a numbers game, we need to demonstrate significant support for the draft.

If you do support this I-D and the allocation of the /10 for shared CGN use, please consider posting a statement of support.  Something as simple as "I support this draft as updated" or "I think the updated draft is more flexible, and would satisfy additional use cases that don't work with RFC1918 space" would be very helpful.

You can respond to the "Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP" thread or post individually to  ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>. Also, please feel free to encourage anyone else you know who supports the draft to make a similar post. Every statement we can gather is vital right now. Last call ends on Thursday, so reply's must be made before then. Thank you.

Cheers,
~Chris