Re: Another last call for draft-weil

Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C421F86D0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SE9UztOTunEm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD0E21F86B3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:28:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C29258F98B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:28:58 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xm+8CTQum-xs for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:28:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8F56258F973 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:28:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_29B88600-399E-4093-80DE-2B89420D1CDD"
Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:28:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CB5E9FDF.4DCE%c.grundemann@cablelabs.com> <2F5AF14A-BC87-4F34-BCB6-842F5722A1F2@delong.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Message-Id: <06627D4F-EE80-4D33-8AB9-AF51D9076A6F@sobco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:11:48 -0800
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:29:02 -0000

+1

On Feb 14, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ross Callon wrote:

> +1.
>  
> Ross
>  
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:06 PM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org
> Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
>  
> I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to move forward and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN allocate the space already.
>  
> Owen
>  
> On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> 
> 
> Fellow BDGKS Authors,
>  
> FYI: draft-weil is in another Last Call following an update that was requested by IESG Ads (on their December telechat, some ADs asked us to turn our request into a request for more 1918 space, but with a few caveats to home router manufacturers about not breaking when exposed to a CGN environment.). At this point we don't expect to change any minds. Basically everyone who is against the draft has spoken up. Now it is just a numbers game, we need to demonstrate significant support for the draft.
>  
> If you do support this I-D and the allocation of the /10 for shared CGN use, please consider posting a statement of support.  Something as simple as "I support this draft as updated" or "I think the updated draft is more flexible, and would satisfy additional use cases that don't work with RFC1918 space" would be very helpful.
>  
> You can respond to the "Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP" thread or post individually to  ietf@ietf.org. Also, please feel free to encourage anyone else you know who supports the draft to make a similar post. Every statement we can gather is vital right now. Last call ends on Thursday, so reply's must be made before then. Thank you.
>  
> Cheers,
> ~Chris
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf