IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Another last call for draft-weil

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 14 February 2012 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AB521F86BD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:49:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3xsQn+cCjRkP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trantor.virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [199.48.134.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8125321F8697 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.159] (unknown [173.245.57.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc) by trantor.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDA041705A; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:49:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_15D6FC5D-5283-46DC-80C6-31F86195974D"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <5BB63F16-DA59-4B07-AA2B-457A1AF2B7F6@harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:49:18 -0800
Message-Id: <AC72C29F-9AFD-482F-B8B1-4627A31A7611@virtualized.org>
References: <5BB63F16-DA59-4B07-AA2B-457A1AF2B7F6@harvard.edu>
To: "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:49:21 -0000

I'm curious:  how is the IETF stopping ARIN from allocating the space?

Thanks,
-drc

On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:33 AM, Bradner, Scott wrote:

> (not voting twice, my other address did not seem to work)
> 
> +1
> 
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
> 
>> +1.
>>  
>> Ross
>>  
>> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:06 PM
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Cc: draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org
>> Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
>>  
>> I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to move forward and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN allocate the space already.
>>  
>> Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email