Re: Another last call for draft-weil

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA2E21F8730 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ga9GvnixVU5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net [67.131.251.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6954821F85C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F061CD23E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A331C2B30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.155.34.51] (unknown [129.192.185.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E47F91C08BE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F3BEA08.7020909@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:23:20 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
References: <CB5E9FDF.4DCE%c.grundemann@cablelabs.com> <2F5AF14A-BC87-4F34-BCB6-842F5722A1F2@delong.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <06627D4F-EE80-4D33-8AB9-AF51D9076A6F@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <06627D4F-EE80-4D33-8AB9-AF51D9076A6F@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:23:28 -0000

I agree.  This needs to be published by the IETF as an RFC. the current 
form is quite suitable for that.

Yours,
Joel

On 2/14/2012 1:28 PM, Scott O Bradner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Feb 14, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ross Callon wrote:
>
>> +1.
>> Ross
>> *From:*ietf-bounces@ietf.org
>> <mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>[mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]*On Behalf
>> Of*Owen DeLong
>> *Sent:*Monday, February 13, 2012 2:06 PM
>> *To:*ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
>> *Cc:*draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org
>> *Subject:*Re: Another last call for draft-weil
>> I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to
>> move forward and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN
>> allocate the space already.
>> Owen
>> On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
>>
>>
>> Fellow BDGKS Authors,
>> FYI: draft-weil is in another Last Call following an update that was
>> requested by IESG Ads (on their December telechat, some ADs asked us
>> to turn our request into a request for more 1918 space, but with a few
>> caveats to home router manufacturers about not breaking when exposed
>> to a CGN environment.). At this point we don't expect to change any
>> minds. Basically everyone who is against the draft has spoken up. Now
>> it is just a numbers game, we need to demonstrate significant support
>> for the draft.
>> If you do support this I-D and the allocation of the /10 for shared
>> CGN use, please consider posting a statement of support. Something as
>> simple as "I support this draft as updated" or "I think the updated
>> draft is more flexible, and would satisfy additional use cases that
>> don't work with RFC1918 space" would be very helpful.
>> You can respond to the "Last Call:
>> <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved
>> IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP" thread or post
>> individually to ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>. Also, please
>> feel free to encourage anyone else you know who supports the draft to
>> make a similar post. Every statement we can gather is vital right now.
>> Last call ends on Thursday, so reply's must be made before then. Thank
>> you.
>> Cheers,
>> ~Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@ietf.org <mailto:Ietf@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf