Re: Another last call for draft-weil
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA2E21F8730 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ga9GvnixVU5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from morbo.mail.tigertech.net (morbo.mail.tigertech.net [67.131.251.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6954821F85C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) by morbo.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F061CD23E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A331C2B30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.155.34.51] (unknown [129.192.185.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E47F91C08BE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F3BEA08.7020909@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:23:20 -0500
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Another last call for draft-weil
References: <CB5E9FDF.4DCE%c.grundemann@cablelabs.com> <2F5AF14A-BC87-4F34-BCB6-842F5722A1F2@delong.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704C70AD046BD@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <06627D4F-EE80-4D33-8AB9-AF51D9076A6F@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <06627D4F-EE80-4D33-8AB9-AF51D9076A6F@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:23:28 -0000
I agree. This needs to be published by the IETF as an RFC. the current form is quite suitable for that. Yours, Joel On 2/14/2012 1:28 PM, Scott O Bradner wrote: > +1 > > On Feb 14, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Ross Callon wrote: > >> +1. >> Ross >> *From:*ietf-bounces@ietf.org >> <mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>[mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]*On Behalf >> Of*Owen DeLong >> *Sent:*Monday, February 13, 2012 2:06 PM >> *To:*ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org> >> *Cc:*draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools. org >> *Subject:*Re: Another last call for draft-weil >> I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to >> move forward and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN >> allocate the space already. >> Owen >> On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote: >> >> >> Fellow BDGKS Authors, >> FYI: draft-weil is in another Last Call following an update that was >> requested by IESG Ads (on their December telechat, some ADs asked us >> to turn our request into a request for more 1918 space, but with a few >> caveats to home router manufacturers about not breaking when exposed >> to a CGN environment.). At this point we don't expect to change any >> minds. Basically everyone who is against the draft has spoken up. Now >> it is just a numbers game, we need to demonstrate significant support >> for the draft. >> If you do support this I-D and the allocation of the /10 for shared >> CGN use, please consider posting a statement of support. Something as >> simple as "I support this draft as updated" or "I think the updated >> draft is more flexible, and would satisfy additional use cases that >> don't work with RFC1918 space" would be very helpful. >> You can respond to the "Last Call: >> <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt> (IANA Reserved >> IPv4 Prefix for Shared Address Space) to BCP" thread or post >> individually to ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>. Also, please >> feel free to encourage anyone else you know who supports the draft to >> make a similar post. Every statement we can gather is vital right now. >> Last call ends on Thursday, so reply's must be made before then. Thank >> you. >> Cheers, >> ~Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org <mailto:Ietf@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Owen DeLong
- RE: Another last call for draft-weil Ross Callon
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Bradner, Scott
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil David Conrad
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Bradner, Scott
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Christopher Morrow
- Let ARIN decide (was Re: Another last call for dr… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Scott O Bradner
- Re: Another last call for draft-weil Joel M. Halpern
- IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Måns Nilsson
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Roger Jørgensen
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules SM
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules Mark Andrews
- Re: IETF Last Calls and Godwin-like rules George Willingmyre