Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 18 April 2016 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351B612D6D9; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaRkfRyKaVAG; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E796512E412; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g185so202313557ioa.2; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=ryi7ZzozPzb2HzAuTVsk1QshxBDox8dMrlZf6+HuPUU=; b=x4Yr/6Lo4Dvl1PMoFg//b0/+LYuTpVX3Lme5SZevTExoIbTM5NYiMlFF18D5Kt7VSp n+n+12FgW/G4zJR1+HPiWgRcI5RGk0BRoO+1GXihZbrBRD24S1ujXo91e8JI75fViWMW HLbFvMo4rWSHHYQNIcc9tjRAiTFCiV6F3jjFVVMyikCVdI87nUo8DYA4iltxT003qIK0 /8Ft5SeDXmJSPiYSle5GZHkyLWmnxpuQJe8S7LLTicBeQ+3B2CUTeonAM0SYJYw91gei ygwjtF3ZPCQteIoJvycuezt8ZPiyWVzc7MB5puShreV6mp9hemN2+ynRuLFK03Lxw9Gk GDDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ryi7ZzozPzb2HzAuTVsk1QshxBDox8dMrlZf6+HuPUU=; b=ktagB6So+QORGL6aqxOvvZYugejoliHk4a3n3EAZz/Uh/rDRdPs0GBShfF3EIKlQMz PjY/+WSHxQmzGX0S5v9J8n0+utXatNrhUg63swuEKhIfsfL8LWzi1YJT7d9C+pG/U1R3 Ig59G6gYiZWrE5j+NOeo+XAyi9khyA8pR81TGxjojzn5SHSwNuySeya6ZxxhXdUG9UwE feaDCwlgcjp8LqEXLHyXaRttaS9yJddJy6KhUwJmdN3debJGL2mV8hXRMNQ42xRloLX0 T1idjFi3wsGbPw3GzurWXcL9b7q8qSyXU0LpqiTJqYEXKD7ZVg6A7edf945VBFB8w5Xn zBoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVtgk/pXaOVc/Fb9eqbDC97v8rbOP+P4oDMrB8TWMOwq1LJECN9Qj8sKVOrECxXqE984vSl63LMazLO5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.10.206 with SMTP id 75mr38015336iok.155.1461002065242; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.222.71 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D3393302.16A48%peter@akayla.com>
References: <D3393302.16A48%peter@akayla.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:24:25 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: G739O0TRgYMAYLZqpToplkU6wHM
Message-ID: <CAB75xn41Uq-0vTYJZLKF+01peE8TJuLb1TG3tgd3bCTgW2WWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f89b41d79c10530c60dd1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3otR_ZGaaTViXn82gcj97oSpVQg>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-iro-update.all@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "dhruv.dhody@huawei.com" <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:54:30 -0000

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the diligent review! See Inline...

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or
> AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review Date: Apr-17-2016
> IETF LC End Date: Mar-29-2016
> IESG Telechat date: Apr-21-2016
>
> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a Standards
> Track RFC, but has some nits that should be fixed before publication.
> [Ready with nits]
>
> This specification documents the results of a survey regarding
> implementation of the Include Route Object for PCEP and uses those results
> to clarify the meaning of section 7.12 of RFC 5440 with updated text.
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None really
>
> Page 5, Section 4, 1st paragraph, 2nd sentence: Are you sure that
> confusing interpretation of the IRO ordering or the L bit doesn’t cause
> any security issues?  I’m not PCEP savvy enough to know if mistakenly
> sending information that should have gone strictly through a loose node
> would disclose anything that the originator didn’t really wish any nodes
> outside of the strict list to see.
>
>
​[Dhruv]: My first instinct is to say that this isn't an issue, as PCEP
speaker are expected to know about the nodes (via TED) irrespective of
strict and loose interpretation of that node. I will discuss this again
with the our shepherd.
​


>
> Nits:
>
> Page 3, first full paragraph: insert “an” before “IRO”.
>
> Page 3, Section 2 title: insert “the” before “IRO”.
>
> Page 3, Section 2, 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert “them” before the
> second “as”.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, 1st paragraph: append a colon to the end of the
> paragraph.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, indented bullet item: remove the hyphen and put the
> remainder between double quotes, not single quotes.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, 1st major bullet item, 1st sentence: insert “an” before
> “IRO”.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, 1st major bullet item, 2nd sentence: change
> “comprising” to “comprised”.  Insert “to” before “section”.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, 2nd major bullet item, 1st sentence: insert “an” before
> “IRO”.  Change the comma to a semicolon.
>
> Page 4, Section 2, 2nd major bullet item, 3rd sentence: insert “the”
> before “Loose”.
>
> Page 4, Section 3, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: delete comma.
>
> Page 4, Section 3, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: change trailing space and
> hyphen to a colon.
>
> Page 4, Section 3, 1st bullet item: delete comma after “IRO”.  Insert
> “the” before the last “IRO”.
>
> Page 5, Section 3, 1st paragraph: insert “the” before “IRO”.
>
> Page 5, Section 4, 1st paragraph, 1st sentence: insert “the” before “IRO”.
>
>
>
> ​[Dhruv]: Thanks! Will Update!

Regards,
Dhruv​