IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [removed] to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 01 April 2020 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074EC3A0A45 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fVJJNHBuV5O for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2983A0A41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1009E2DD06; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, ietf@ietf.org, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: [removed] to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair
References: <158515861056.31362.1577145055370523251@ietfa.amsl.com> <06f0ef99-728e-1b41-0596-7b7286c29ead@comcast.net> <CA+9kkMBTb=Z2C5VJ1LQ6JoN0hB8OnmSdebkLHFhG+O-9F_Tv7A@mail.gmail.com> <2375d191-dd72-3e09-6417-5bcae5ba1d4b@comcast.net> <C6F6A4AB-3515-4E11-961B-66B87EDA995A@piuha.net> <b01bc927-e9e3-0b43-0247-aa4ebfc098e4@gmail.com> <ybl1rp9ipyz.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <f1725be1-ccd6-423e-4ec7-9e34eb9c02bb@comcast.net> <yblpnctfu3w.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <0E3AE8F4F693BE011BBF77F8@PSB> <ybla73ww0yd.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20200401001114.11b23fa0@elandnews.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:58:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200401001114.11b23fa0@elandnews.com> (S. Moonesamy's message of "Wed, 01 Apr 2020 01:43:33 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblo8sayfs8.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4A6tUNR3JHLywqS1YSNz1kboH84>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 22:58:38 -0000

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> writes:

Hi Subramanian,

Answering the question you asked of me:

> I would not ask you about "executive sessions" as I have some
> experience of how that type of session works.  There are different
> schools of thought about what should be minuted once a committee exits
> I'll ask you a difficult question; is an e-vote confidential?

Different organizations I'm sure do things different.  Most voting
organizations I've sat on in the past have publicly recorded individual
votes for most items (except commonly minus voting for leadership
positions within the organizations).  The IAB's individual votes aren't
publicly recorded, though I don't personally know the history of why
that is the case.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status