Re: Eliot Lear to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 30 March 2020 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4066F3A0FF6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSyJF6VBa2i9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C0F3A0FF4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 33DAA297E2; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Eliot Lear to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair
References: <158515861056.31362.1577145055370523251@ietfa.amsl.com> <06f0ef99-728e-1b41-0596-7b7286c29ead@comcast.net> <CA+9kkMBTb=Z2C5VJ1LQ6JoN0hB8OnmSdebkLHFhG+O-9F_Tv7A@mail.gmail.com> <2375d191-dd72-3e09-6417-5bcae5ba1d4b@comcast.net> <C6F6A4AB-3515-4E11-961B-66B87EDA995A@piuha.net> <b01bc927-e9e3-0b43-0247-aa4ebfc098e4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:48:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <b01bc927-e9e3-0b43-0247-aa4ebfc098e4@gmail.com> (Brian E. Carpenter's message of "Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:43:50 +1300")
Message-ID: <ybl1rp9ipyz.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/s6CyrCiCedE_yaujiCoYNGqkbso>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:48:22 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> writes:

> Thanks for the clarification. But I think it's *essential* to have
> co-chairs in this case, since any plausible chair for this topic is
> bound to have some definite opinions and that makes fair chairing very
> difficult. This has nothing to do with the choice of Eliot.

Speaking entirely from a <nohats> point of view: I agree with you, and
others, completely that the program should have two chairs.  I think the
community entirely agrees with this perspective, and I'll certainly do
my part to make this happen.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI