Re: Eliot Lear to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 02 April 2020 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5E13A0C7E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZcLd4j1YsX7c for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41613A0C80 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p200300dee7270100d858764f16a13b2f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e727:100:d858:764f:16a1:3b2f]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jK59M-0003g3-Rt; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:05:12 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: Eliot Lear to Serve as RFC Editor Future Development Program Chair
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <40cfe42c-0805-5db6-6080-864a5994026d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 21:05:12 +0200
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <99221AE5-37E3-424C-B45B-200828C78FAE@kuehlewind.net>
References: <158515861056.31362.1577145055370523251@ietfa.amsl.com> <06f0ef99-728e-1b41-0596-7b7286c29ead@comcast.net> <CA+9kkMBTb=Z2C5VJ1LQ6JoN0hB8OnmSdebkLHFhG+O-9F_Tv7A@mail.gmail.com> <2375d191-dd72-3e09-6417-5bcae5ba1d4b@comcast.net> <C6F6A4AB-3515-4E11-961B-66B87EDA995A@piuha.net> <b01bc927-e9e3-0b43-0247-aa4ebfc098e4@gmail.com> <253D2C1C-28A0-4CAB-BDD2-D12280E8E3A0@akamai.com> <B1DAAFD2-6FA3-4DD8-9DEF-9C9D50D8C506@ericsson.com> <40cfe42c-0805-5db6-6080-864a5994026d@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1585854317;e85d0fcd;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1jK59M-0003g3-Rt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n6GzfbMewZTjDnqrgJZE7iDs5WI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 19:05:21 -0000

Hi Brian,

Thanks for sharing your concern. My concern or rather, maybe slightly pessimistic, expectation is that just rerunning the previous process immediately right now might not make it easier to pick a second chair or may even lead, in the worse case, to the same result again of not being able to select a second chair. My understanding of the decision made by the previous members of the IAB is that the main intention was to get things set up to the point where the actual work and discussion can start - meaning creating a program and having at least one person that manages it. Therefore I’m hoping that we can take at least a little more time to figure out the right process and timing without impacting the work negatively.

Mirja



> On 31. Mar 2020, at 22:26, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mirja,
> 
> Thanks. I am a bit concerned that you say "months" not "weeks".
> 
> Regards
>   Brian
> 
> On 31-Mar-20 10:50, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
>> Hi Brian, hi Rich,
>> 
>> Thanks for your feedback. The IAB is planning to consider the appointment of a second chair in the coming months. At the moment we see it as most important to have a venue to develop proposals for discussion, and the IAB liaisons will logically support Elliot, if and whenever needed, to get the work started as soon as possible.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 28.03.20, 02:21, "ietf on behalf of Salz, Rich" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>>>   It was however explicit in the preceding discussions *and* in the IAB's call for nominations:
>> 
>>>   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RSM0PyZ0CERQswyZ3CakuH8BT0k/
>> 
>>    Yeah, seems like something (someone?) slipped through the cracks here.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>