IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 12 December 2014 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012C1A6F3A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdxvIi8hmOvr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FE91A1B61 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ft15so7699413pdb.18 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v9kLc0aE/4e+6KKvg24Jl11vXDlo4khQIgI/7cunqkM=; b=fECaodVspFh5K0vEalqKCrj5hACFNgFJEsXGXIQL41sKUyvr/V0xzfZ/cWd9CKbmrM 1PCgjnC2zaRLik9nZQZEC0ugVzu97pQFCZvJKczoUBEG87qOkdR9Ma+3j9ogzrrMFfoa BqcS7owqMX99HcMdteljgZ186+Woqw5hr+8MqbF0EccJckSXUJH6LlK3ieCkjKdRdyVN rycyEoDdzhQWC+l7fyNAnvU7Kzi+sVRqO6Jk05Kiw2lvPi8bQsUAvoUSovpJSyOGxz1k 1ftxQF2X8IbiYfLzTIcNFSNdqrhdVWc4fFRUSWwwEArFVqBXrXl3uGTc7giX+Mv9zILC 8owA==
X-Received: by 10.68.167.36 with SMTP id zl4mr29092983pbb.83.1418412715608; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (235.231.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.231.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm2246725pbs.10.2014.12.12.11.31.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <548B42B5.50509@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:32:05 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: RFC 6346 successful: moving to Proposed Standard
References: <547F451C.3010507@dcrocker.net> <D0AE1053.7AA8A%Lee@asgard.org> <AF1B977B-75D4-4AF2-B231-300AF2429317@nominum.com> <CAMm+Lwji9860CKaJB_9xi3ztiVUtP3NZ8AgO1wZAVTKVWW76Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CADC+-gR+sFUELOrdfVj5e3hW-KZoftotbhvEwF6aotZvq5wOkw@mail.gmail.com> <1DF3E368-D915-458C-8009-C508735D3C88@nominum.com> <5488FEE0.2030400@gmail.com> <84E9B4C0-A2E2-41BF-955A-1B125BBE63B1@nominum.com> <54890CD3.2050800@gmail.com> <20141211034501.1776A25434AE@rock.dv.isc.org> <20141212051204.GG39631@shrubbery.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141212051204.GG39631@shrubbery.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6JrYdbF3L35VJYZylN-DQ_aIC5s
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:31:57 -0000

On 12/12/2014 18:12, heasley wrote:
...
> I don't know anyone enchanted by v6.

Strange choice of word. I'm not in the least enchanted by IPv4
or by NAT44 either. I just know as a matter of fact that the
IPv4nternet ran out of addresses a while back and we have no
alternative but to fix it using IPv6. All the rest is details,
important details of course, but details.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email