Re: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 21 June 2009 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786063A6D14 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.170, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKc8W2XbSWd6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FBC3A6B19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED4119878D; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:50:28 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AD7198665; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:50:26 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4A3E80F1.5030802@piuha.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:50:25 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP
References: <20090605234511.3274D3A6B31@core3.amsl.com> <7AB0ADBF842DA348AFEF348E@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <7AB0ADBF842DA348AFEF348E@PST.JCK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:50:15 -0000

John,

> I think we have reached agreement that the
> 	Nomcom should be able to suppress names when they
> 	conclude that is desirable --that they "may" publish
> 	lists of names if they decide to do so.  But the text of
> 	the document actually doesn't make that clear.  It
> 	provides that a list can be published, that updated list
> 	can be published if the Nomcom considers that desirable,
> 	and that there should be no ringers.  It does not
> 	explicitly provide for publishing a list that omits some
> 	willing candidates, no matter what the reason.
>   

I agree that we should allow this.

Jari

P.S. For the other issues in your mail -- FWIW, I believe fairly 
strongly that we should make the specific changes proposed in this 
document, as opposed to starting a more general redesign.