Re: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 17 June 2009 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE2D3A6E50 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.218, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZZGVbtE7VY0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C7F3A69B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,236,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="43020777"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2009 13:38:25 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5HDcPj6029512; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:38:25 +0200
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5HDcPic016755; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:38:25 GMT
Received: from Stewarts-Computer-2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id n5HDcOm11471; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:38:24 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4A38F1D0.8040403@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:38:24 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist (Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees) to BCP
References: <20090605234511.3274D3A6B31@core3.amsl.com> <7AB0ADBF842DA348AFEF348E@PST.JCK.COM> <4A38EF2C.60305@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4A38EF2C.60305@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=582; t=1245245905; x=1246109905; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; z=From:=20Stewart=20Bryant=20<stbryant@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Last=20Call=3A=20draft-dawkins-nomcom-o penlist=20(Nominating=09Committee=0A=20Process=3A=20Open=20D isclosure=20of=20Willing=20Nominees)=20to=20BCP |Sender:=20; bh=cCdmFsGWGcXUmC9PsrSNnsEE5xs1ESdN87KEvbfXoQE=; b=U4rEDure3x6EQ2TFy0AdXpKU+Hz4Iq7VCHk2ZiYdSsy2r93f+JY+M35J6f z+2ZPbJZVicfdUmg2ZM4vIdb2Ttoh5+S22+DNlzl+IBaYQDBGneC7EpVU08z +VLU/qP3BH;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=stbryant@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:38:28 -0000

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Something like: "This is the list of those
> nominated (or self-nominated) for IESG positions. The
> nominees have said that they're willing to serve if
> selected, but there is no implication that they consider
> the incumbent unsuited for re-appointment."
>
>   
Presumably there would need to be a second list of
names with the text: "These nominees have said that
they're willing to serve because they think the
incumbent is unsuitable for re-appointment."

... or maybe this would be expresses as just a
second list of names.

Stewart