IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 27 March 2024 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCCEC14F61D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSCtoZeEWW1D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808BFC14F5FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.71.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 42RA8wg0002416 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1711534151; x=1711620551; i=@elandsys.com; bh=L9vJdLteDKEVlfD5nvikd1H2EbX1f+nIpWP0Rei4jmU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Pv9/jxmHDQ1B8KX2ZfEFmQbTjIbFhOWaMnbH/n+5v9kmqI1DiGUWcIJiDiLAcvE55 UDMIbMBKhVjGOny+X//IWmVdsPWKImpZ3riaLtXvKaKfd27I1Fhq/4gDa0i4iFBYLT aiOT6NXkMgNNAMj9oGQKhSbg5bthFRZ2zu5osXO4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20240327022901.141279e0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:07:51 -0700
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
In-Reply-To: <4140C376-C5C2-4CA6-B436-BAE7418CD043@tzi.org>
References: <c140a11a-7930-471a-a3bc-5d4362e5889a@alumni.stanford.edu> <4140C376-C5C2-4CA6-B436-BAE7418CD043@tzi.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9QbQAuf_W5YfVI6iiA3R-qKMoXs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:09:25 -0000

Hi Carsten,
At 02:37 AM 26-03-2024, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>Folks , Randy is right.
>
>If this discussion is intended to spark a rule change, please keep 
>in mind that these rules weren't made for the security area, but for 
>the whole of IANA. Please don't damage the parts you don't know about.

I searched for the draft which may have triggered the 
discussion.  There is an AD Review at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/lFnPC9QhTYiAX8dj1LyzzRw7avo/

There were three Last Call comments:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/nU4qQG3sPAOdHjEclDGVp48U65w/
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/fXrjYMK_ntGoQLhIhOPZOVFsp-8/
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/iyWF0bPMVLEv9NgZ1sCkkjOM-Bo/

I could not find any significant issue listed in those messages.  I 
assume that the Last Call [1] would not have been requested if there 
were major issues with the draft.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/pcoVXz6bb1iQfEMAdo 
WSa3AVZoc/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email