IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Back to] Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 18 June 2013 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB8911E80E8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KvQssEy8Y0G6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trantor.virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [199.48.134.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DF921E80AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.19] (c-24-4-109-25.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.109.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc) by trantor.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA4D1712A; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:15:08 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: [Back to] Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZncSO_nnpe0wPgfsEY9zGnCj=N0tE_8MyXZ1gL6re+cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:15:07 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <333C0971-E28F-4F0C-B1DE-A09E75A07763@virtualized.org>
References: <F14A1FD640A19C37C743AFC2@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAL9jLaZncSO_nnpe0wPgfsEY9zGnCj=N0tE_8MyXZ1gL6re+cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:15:18 -0000

Chris,

On Jun 18, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not such a fan of the draft, mostly because it appears to remove
> some principles that some RIR folk hold up in their policy discussions
> as important... while not having a backstop in said policies to
> replace the originals from 2050.

Which principles are you referencing?

Thanks,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email