Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 18 June 2013 18:15 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1879821F99BE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tR7Zof+fTa1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD2211E80F6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v1so3916656lbd.32 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NvZ/1W4L0pZnE7VQd66oE9qJ3IQdMHj04qdoxFN08GM=; b=r2XzIT7IjIV5saKZNoj92VopB8RSDuviDR9ZPJhyUX/5r32Z2GsZfYhcUIzFpptZOs XNTq6w5KwP+lOkiLG55uHr1QVmRKeCzRFf9wn8SJKSguhNR1g347zi3tueoteO6sQnW7 nFDr0NQUvldk0kw7fVJPo3MZzMj+9vPtbgUXkRvm3m88t4wjio+50y0/AWTpcPqTkpya Fv+Lf7EdbQKPgow6yMDj2rEjHVp43DIRrIw9a0vhdQbkePrNGDz99BLq0jO8ssVp3RXd 3YAtDAyeUN8jOCdPbbBFbOdOhydH1a6ltTCFudYQIIAuB5JZh8bqKExWCyi28rtWR3Zw EAGg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.156.42 with SMTP id wb10mr1599663lbb.62.1371579291055; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.22.196 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4357630D-9FF4-4A6E-91E9-4731B02FD4FA@piuha.net>
References: <F14A1FD640A19C37C743AFC2@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAL9jLaZncSO_nnpe0wPgfsEY9zGnCj=N0tE_8MyXZ1gL6re+cA@mail.gmail.com> <4357630D-9FF4-4A6E-91E9-4731B02FD4FA@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:14:50 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tljEHp-zEzSz-rUoJS8Kw1EJFa0
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZK6H8r-tizX+RhmZPYzOViJF5rr91QtURX8nGysORYSw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC)
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:15:00 -0000
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote: > Chris: The last call on RFC 2050 bis has ended. The draft will be shortly on the IESG telechat, up for an approval decision and/or suggestion for changes. I personally think it is ready to move forward. That is not to say that we wouldn't take comments, if you have some. > ok, cool... my only comment was on the timing issue... which I doubt will get fixed before pub time, and isn't a show-stopper though ... will make the conversation at the RIR level a bit more challenging for some folks I imagine. -chris
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… John C Klensin
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Back to] Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bi… David Conrad
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… John C Klensin
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [Back to] Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bi… Christopher Morrow
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Randy Bush
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Patrik Fältström
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… SM
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Patrik Fältström
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Paul Hoffman
- Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN and W… Edward Lewis
- Re: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN a… joel jaeggli
- Re: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN a… Thomas Narten
- Re: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN a… Patrik Fältström
- RE: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN a… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: Lessons from PROVREG WG was Re: IETF, ICANN a… Edward Lewis
- Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards John Levine
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards Ted Lemon
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards Warren Kumari
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards Joe Abley
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Las… Warren Kumari
- Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards John R. Levine
- Re: IETF, ICANN and non-standards John C Klensin
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Las… John C Klensin
- Re: [IETF] IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Ca… John Curran
- Re: [IETF] IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Ca… David Farmer
- Re: [IETF] IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Ca… John C Klensin
- Re: [IETF] IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Ca… John Curran
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <dr… Fred Baker (fred)