Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

[Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>]

I assume – many of us are in the similar situation, especially those who use VPN access to their enterprises.

I’m all for v6 everywhere, however, in order to support those, who can’t be on v6, separate SSID should be provided, perhaps would be good to remind all IETF attendees – test your stuff on v6 only network, otherwise you might be out of luck in the future. Singapore however wouldn’t be the right point in time to switch v4 off completely.

 

My 0.2

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

From: ietf <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Andrew G. Malis" <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, July 28, 2017 at 14:41
To: Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "Brzozowski, John" <[e-mail]>, Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

 

Ted,

 

As one example, I have a VPN application over which I have no control that I must use to reach corporate resources, including email. I haven’t yet had a chance to try it with V6 and nat64, maybe it’ll work and maybe it won’t. If it doesn’t, I’ll need to use the legacy network, which is currently unencrypted. We would need to include a new SSID for an encrypted v4/v6 network (what we currently deliver on the “ietf” SSID). If that new SSID is provided, then I’ll be OK with the migration.

 

Thanks,

Andy