Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 28/07/17 21:38, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I'm not very enthusiastic about this. People come to the IETF to do work
> and having
> to deal with potential bustage from this experiment gets in the way of that.
> 

+1

IIUC correctly this'd also break DNSSEC for some names and has to.
If so, I'd be against it.

S.

> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Brzozowski, John <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> Apologies, I understand this mail did not make it to the various lists.
>>
>> John
>> [phone]
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Brzozowski <[e-mail]>
>> Date: Sunday, July 16, 2017 at 20:28
>> To: "[e-mail]" <
>> [e-mail]>
>> Cc: Randy Bush <[e-mail]>, Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>, Jim
>> Martin <[e-mail]>, Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>, Suresh
>> Krishnan <[e-mail]>, Russ Housley <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
>>
>>     Folks,
>>
>>     Apologies in advance for the gratuitous cross posting (v6ops, ietf,
>> ipv6, sunset4, softwires).  I hope, to you all, this is worth the added
>> email.
>>
>>     The draft below was written to provide the necessary documentation to
>> enable the IETF (the NOC, participants, etc.) to migrate to an IPv6 only
>> primary network connection (Wi-Fi and wired) that utilizes NAT64+DNS64 to
>> access IPv4 only content.  The request for IETF 99 has been to have the
>> primary “ietf” SSID adhere to what is documented in the I-D below.  I trust
>> the motivation is understood.  This means that the main “ietf” SSID would
>> be switched to be IPv6 only with NAT64+DNS64 (at layer 3) per the I-D
>> below.  Given the that IETF99 is upon us, this may or may not be entirely
>> possible.
>>
>>     At this stage, the infrastructure preparations for IETF 99 should be
>> in place to ensure that the IETF has the necessary hardware for redundancy
>> and performance.
>>
>>     So, we are all seeking your input.  Given the above, what would all
>> you suggest is tolerable for IETF99 as it pertains to the I-D below?
>>
>>     • IPv6 only per the I-D for the balance of IETF week?
>>     • IPv6 only per the I-D for one or more days this week?
>>     • IPv6 only per the I-D for the plenary?
>>     • IPv6 only per the I-D for the next IETF meeting?
>>
>>     Please send us your feedback.
>>
>>     Regards,
>>
>>     John
>>     [phone]
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>>     Date: Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 03:04
>>     To: Marcus Keane <[e-mail]>, Jen Linkova <
>> [e-mail]>, Lorenzo Colitti <[e-mail]>, John Brzozowski <
>> [e-mail]>, Erik Kline <[e-mail]>, John
>> Brzozowski <[e-mail]>, David Schinazi <
>> [e-mail]>, Stuart Cheshire <[e-mail]>, Jen Linkova <
>> [e-mail]>, Paul Saab <[e-mail]>, David Schinazi <
>> [e-mail]>
>>     Subject: New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-
>> only-incremental-00.txt
>>
>>
>>         A new version of I-D, draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-
>> only-incremental-00.txt
>>         has been successfully submitted by John Jason Brzozowski and
>> posted to the
>>         IETF repository.
>>
>>         Name:           draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental
>>         Revision:       00
>>         Title:          Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF
>> Meetings
>>         Document date:  2017-06-30
>>         Group:          Individual Submission
>>         Pages:          15
>>         URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-
>> drafts/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00.txt
>>         Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/
>> doc/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental/
>>         Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/
>> draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00
>>         Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/
>> doc/html/draft-jjmb-v6ops-ietf-ipv6-only-incremental-00
>>
>>
>>         Abstract:
>>            The purpose of this document is to provide a blueprint and
>> guidance
>>            for deploying IPv6-only Wi-Fi at IETF meetings.  This document
>>            outlines infrastructure and operational guidance that operators
>>            should consider when deploying IPv6-only networks using NAT64
>> and
>>            DNS64 to support communication to legacy IPv4-only services.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>> submission
>>         until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>> tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>         The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>