IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-dolson-plus-middlebox-benefits (was RE: Review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09)

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 11 April 2017 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B012EC52 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_8dam6fRjhe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DC6A12EC51 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: ietf@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local ([194.88.241.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v3BIsIfN097147 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:54:19 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host [194.88.241.232] claimed to be cupcake.local
Message-ID: <58ED2651.8040109@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:54:09 +0200
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Macintosh/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-dolson-plus-middlebox-benefits (was RE: Review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-09)
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E4B818@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <11843452-d76d-50e3-c162-155f4d1621e2@cs.tcd.ie> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E4B953@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170411120303.5128273.2297.7062@sandvine.com> <36f11093-8283-dbcc-68d5-0c7f4267988c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <36f11093-8283-dbcc-68d5-0c7f4267988c@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DI-u-hpVZPCvUQzpnjO_npVzBQs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:54:30 -0000

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> BTW I don't see ECMP or load balancing listed in section 3. Those
> seem to be major applications of transport layer snooping.

no, any load balancing which needs to scale needs to be stateless, so
you don't want session based mechanisms handling this.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email