IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old Errata

"Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 12 September 2016 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7747F12B237 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.028
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.028 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SuzIjJweIrrg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D736412B1F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4140; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473676277; x=1474885877; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=qgbM9lWd08nPICIbd/hdlt1x18PFgY8FmlZlmYrc37I=; b=frqHxMALrG4VhLC49/Pp4LZoldjavjlIzihKd/UOFxcNBHwLefhvqMqM gszvYdhhlhdCm5XOAMuIsljk6IE4a1pk3paE5NEFB+JjG89Gb+GcX+ky2 mqRLPZ8x5iDS1A+eHQTcEHBPG+MdA/6M7dedtWDAQaMX1ba9CZympPiO5 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BEBwDGgtZX/4QNJK1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgwYzAQEBAQEegVOsFIcrhQ2CA4YdAhyBGToSAQIBAQEBAQEBXidBEoQOAQEFIwpBHQEIBA0DAQIBCSECBA0SER0KBAESiDADF7QeiHANgx4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEfhjCEUIJEghQJgmKCWgWGZgmSPzUBjGiCY4FuhGCJFIhJhAyDegElAyyEW3CDeoJ6AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,322,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="322302117"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Sep 2016 10:31:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8CAVHFd009202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:31:17 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 05:31:16 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 05:31:16 -0500
From: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Old Errata
Thread-Topic: Old Errata
Thread-Index: AQHSDODKDvO8Px2M7UKGC4g6lhxEeA==
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:31:15 +0000
Message-ID: <qg34kyashkyv10c1b7m7hqb0.1473676240901@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_qg34kyashkyv10c1b7m7hqb01473676240901emailandroidcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/DRSei8yc2VBHO2fBinPIVSQaoe0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:31:19 -0000

Stephen,

I always considered that the "ping" was precisely the errata report.

Regards, Benoît



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

-------- Original message --------
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: 12/09/2016 12:16 (GMT+01:00)
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Old Errata



On 12/09/16 10:56, Loa Andersson wrote:
>
> The ADs might have to point to someone to resolve the (oldest) errata.
> Or errata that belong to closed wg's.

FWIW, for my WGs, I follow the practice of handling any
errata for which someone shows interest. So if there're
any that need to be processed, then please ping me, and/or
a relevant mailing list and I'll take action. If, OTOH,
nobody is interested, then that is also true of me:-)

While other ADs may be more proactive than me, I think
it's true that if pinged, ADs will generally take action.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email