IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old Errata

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 September 2016 19:20 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0464112B0CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ln6pCmi8Ryc4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x234.google.com (mail-yb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5114912B0D0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x234.google.com with SMTP id d69so17998947ybf.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SI3MYn78HYaCo4VBLGBo2V+PB5eZL3S/GDUx+SHlz+Q=; b=Hwuzlit5AvI7JNq21XbBNV9l5uLjPhdtvDcEgBYqdwZyTyXjsz1dXqGUuBiYSauisl IsXexVbt9mr7bD0l0zogDMZAxuvSPt71Ii4toQj+YrwvbYa2HKv4J5Am27PZkwQ6p3K/ s/Mu8KW+TJN+2YwfwllfWXqfXC+CacjxYiyEmnSq/cBr3iBY8EzsNgXL9XG+O1NSSGkx k/FW6jioEUOLMnjzXv33lMicxejskLx3Q9smQwpq0ZXx5cnVq/oD014jY3lN6r7JRNh4 UjRqP0+AFNRID3iWpF9/Yc9KFXSjtAsQbCayH+PISsDjZRL0amyEh5IjxbbZ/A7bwZMW et7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SI3MYn78HYaCo4VBLGBo2V+PB5eZL3S/GDUx+SHlz+Q=; b=LrdLzKlbJxsxjUTtes9HS7pCtbzVmwwjmr1NhHsLuemz/J/NbALOiA8yL7eUc4430G 1j1egiSarO/XHxiN/zOSFbNkI893guG7MAWFGo2AK+edvbesuAijxKlHwARVASDgvUJ6 BLY9Bof4OTuCO7rde2QiWIOa2qQU8FUbXltvcgjfvM1bi+v1JGmd8YQs3pXJAzY9/AFv vz9atqnevbPmBNwk50arnF3yE+FSBPq9/QvbueOzmuXSCJ30aKHvhsmdZw53pwXbed14 WbRtWMaq71NyIPFdEJbtIPOMBJzhvQVYR3T5QQ4QrIjgyEjB9jD0SrpF03cF7CQO+rFG ZHMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOhB/uvNkko6NmxDeXLAxO//eKboNLm750QPUJckcvsHL7xD3r3EaGnqdVPSDGCnpLX7at6yZ1puoj9+Q==
X-Received: by 10.37.106.197 with SMTP id f188mr19836467ybc.151.1473708033597; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.24.86 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <qg34kyashkyv10c1b7m7hqb0.1473676240901@email.android.com>
References: <qg34kyashkyv10c1b7m7hqb0.1473676240901@email.android.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:20:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-c4XmrXs3VB7mR5zdJj_-nUWsmbY6zLoPCkKi2yeArtVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Old Errata
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fc66ad866d5053c5463f3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eyVJKykY0nDl7v9BbT1dnj2FeDw>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:20:40 -0000

Hi, Benoit,

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Benoit Claise (bclaise) <bclaise@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Stephen,
>
> I always considered that the "ping" was precisely the errata report.
>

It probably was, when the errata was filed. For NFSv4, that was
approximately 3 responsible ADs ago :-) ...

I did a sucky job of chasing errata during my first term, but I think I've
asked for guidance on all the errata for my current working groups, unless
I knew what to do with them, in which case, I did something with them.

I've gotten good responses on some, and not on others, which isn't
surprising in a volunteer organization, I guess.

Spencer, the current AD for nfsv4 :-)


> Regards, Benoît
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> Date: 12/09/2016 12:16 (GMT+01:00)
> To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF
> Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Old Errata
>
>
>
> On 12/09/16 10:56, Loa Andersson wrote:
> >
> > The ADs might have to point to someone to resolve the (oldest) errata.
> > Or errata that belong to closed wg's.
>
> FWIW, for my WGs, I follow the practice of handling any
> errata for which someone shows interest. So if there're
> any that need to be processed, then please ping me, and/or
> a relevant mailing list and I'll take action. If, OTOH,
> nobody is interested, then that is also true of me:-)
>
> While other ADs may be more proactive than me, I think
> it's true that if pinged, ADs will generally take action.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email