Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 03 December 2014 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DE81A1B2B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 05:49:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.498
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tr7GPnnxzjL9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 05:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BD05F1A1B29 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 05:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 69367 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2014 13:37:10 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 3 Dec 2014 13:37:10 -0000
Message-ID: <547F14FF.9090600@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:49:51 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution in a Middlebox Internet (SEMI)
References: <9D725DD0-7136-4D02-99E0-48E03C173C9E@iab.org> <BB616542-70E8-47F9-99E8-305AA63B45C9@iab.org> <5475A0A5.50105@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <5475A0A5.50105@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E1oAT_xkEk2PjN5zLEJWJfTyo8w
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:49:57 -0000
This time to IETF list; As I wrote: > The problem, however, is that the review comment are so > surprising that the result of SEMI workshop is very simply > proven (see below) to be "incorrect and incomplete". are there anyone who argue against the proof? To explain it less formally without the end to end argument, According to RFC3424 written by IAB: o Shipping NATs often contain Application Layer Gateways (ALGs) which attempt to be context-sensitive, depending on the source or destination port number. The behavior of the ALGs can be hard to anticipate and these behaviors have not always been documented. but, CFP of SEMI2015 says: Can common transport functionality and standardization help application developers to implement and deploy such approaches in today’s Internet? which means SEMI2015 has, quite seemingly, a prejudice to focus only on "common" and/or standardized, thus, well known, functionality of ALGs, ignoring undocumented ones. As such, it is obvious that such approach won't work for ALGs with undocumented functionality. Then, there is no point to have SEMI2015 only to harm the Internet community by having an IAB authorized workshop report containing wrong approaches. Still, one might argue that, with incremental approach by making the mechanisms more and more complicated, at some point, we might finally be able to make it complete and correct. Those who can enjoy the formalism of the end to end argument can recognize that the argument is the simple and straight forward proof that it is impossible. Masataka Ohta
- Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolution … IAB Chair
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… IAB Chair
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Eliot Lear
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Joe Touch
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Joe Touch
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Joe Touch
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Call for Papers: IAB Workshop on Stack Evolut… Masataka Ohta