IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 09 May 2021 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187A53A1B83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 12:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMNROD7YIB4p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D50D3A1B80 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2021 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com with SMTP id r8so18761167ybb.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 May 2021 12:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HRS6IWbj/3pHJN+Pg68aJQr7tOzElgTil2XwgydSc9w=; b=tcYp8W9fPycKbBD/Ip2++r8Heh25bT1+ZbcEAMD0kJ1pXqn9htqgNTvH6PL42tCb5K JaU2j4BsZW7dKaac33dwGY+uIC6uSSP8P0IlOdzmgr67wi+AK92lUR9Jd96v02WLRh79 w/0fxkC8EgMGsPTMnjMfsalnqAhpKBr7A9kTuUTA3J5DQ9WqmeK9dSTBQKzLFCWbNYbl /PR1SFphoE26Pwj9mrnd5KR5VMPoQHENc2CMFF3hxMriHmme77Q1qYL/cELfqjKar/bm LV2QaDJEO67rU1bBtWbUvOk1y6b5+Ql6Tsx5T4qJBfvMri8WI0M3/6yQ0YiJnjM9L3// RqgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HRS6IWbj/3pHJN+Pg68aJQr7tOzElgTil2XwgydSc9w=; b=hX6hQ43IEVCyqiCS4/8t/qMq4oxm11gTqfhjY+fkZfZJyvUZVsHHF4U/BgfS/LGBNs v3O19pXqGpzdH7VoCK2aNcPGI8OWmZR1e18EIANcs2Beh79dLRrN3QGeePhB6fsF/4hY MWM4nYgH8SFY6esbNurQtL1gwvxLYjKg1AkEYc9tUI1IvbZ2Ql4Bs+TLoWG/blUtdLLU VAmWhapWnXIAWqMLoKc3wQ0wKntkui7Uf/Ae72d4Mo39xHCbxtivyv6ucxKWZ6DeHHvN sv7/4YTCUWmwkqFDH+F60L6rWZ2hY4LNRLbDqsoMoFZO/YGjlC2vHYQQrLHv1wFS4jmX zjEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VrpQ5MEo+9pLxa8+uzjWu9UPtIlX5lHX8Irbc7ZMK8k4QV0YC XOYW01nHDwozlRd5HTa+PxNHNtRFAqw0ARUmXGU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJD8OVuF6aAYZrPTyo4qpkO01YYbvM+kighbtAI1azDA5HPc16uNUMT7gpxkuI0ag5quIcI+ldIpUCEGWB14U=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:11c6:: with SMTP id 189mr28184558ybr.154.1620587188707; Sun, 09 May 2021 12:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162040549861.22240.16336069769197991691@ietfa.amsl.com> <18d87dd8-3363-ef49-36f6-a34ff8c60e59@gmail.com> <30545.1620482040@localhost> <26dd8249-0df7-2974-1a5e-8f590c3f6ff7@gmail.com> <44DD7D6A-C36C-43B3-B3DD-4C977C89D2E8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44DD7D6A-C36C-43B3-B3DD-4C977C89D2E8@gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 14:06:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-empxevGOC83PVnQTVpt+MZEQUNg++FUi-ODHi8F=5wCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5e6a905c1ea5b71"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/E9lJxsb4OO3UfZBWpoLY6BOUCFU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 19:06:34 -0000

Hi, Stewart,

On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 3:29 AM Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Perhaps we should require the IESG Chair to report the errata stats by
> area at each IETF?
>

We might disagree on how responsive ADs have been, or should be, to public
shaming in general, but I remember that the errata states were presented at
plenary when I joined the IESG, and Martin and I managed to be pretty
shameless, when it came to errata 😂

Slide in
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-iesg-opsplenary-0.pdf.

Best,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email