IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Friday @ IETF61?

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Thu, 02 September 2004 14:11 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05820; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2sM7-0007HG-Rl; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 10:14:28 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2s77-00082V-Md; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:58:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2s2j-0005bT-IR for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:54:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03998 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:54:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2s57-0005nA-TU for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:56:55 -0400
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2004 06:55:33 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com [171.71.163.17]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i82Drm2l006477; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cisco.com ([10.25.65.178]) by mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with SMTP id AYQ40961; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:53:22 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
To: "Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)" <henk@ripe.net>
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409021542460.2868@cow.ripe.net>
Message-Id: <742E6B1A-FCE7-11D8-B4E7-000A95E35274@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 09:48 AM, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC) 
wrote:
> The same applies to Sunday and Friday but this hasn't caused any 
> problem
> so-far.  Why would Saturday be different?

"Fridays" is actually Friday night.  The proscriptions against
work on Saturday are for the entire day, until sunset.

Melinda


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email