IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Friday @ IETF61?

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 02 September 2004 10:47 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA20631; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2pAd-0007GX-I2; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:50:24 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2or3-0001FC-Tv; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:30:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2ol7-0005Zw-Qx for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:24:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA19020 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:23:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2onU-00055k-7O for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 06:26:29 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835BD61BB5; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:23:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22290-10; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:23:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (145.80-202-211.nextgentel.com [80.202.211.145]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD4F61BAF; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:23:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:23:32 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <B6AA426614BDD56977F7B06A@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <20040902081813.GH575@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <20040831110959.GG20023@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <21B643BC0DEBC0C9E0937043@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <20040902081813.GH575@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On torsdag, september 02, 2004 09:18:13 +0100 Tim Chown 
<tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Pretty full?   There were two WG meetings and two BoFs... although
> (for the first time?) there was an afternoon session (with 1 WG!).

hm. You're right (with corrections as noted).
btw - the afternoon session was an IRTF RG, not an IETF WG, if I remember 
rightly. They asked for it, they got it.

One reason for my bad memory may be found in the draft agendas....

June 1: 2 WGs (like most other slots)
June 16: 4 WGs (most other slots had 6)
June 25: 3 WGs
July 14: 4 WGs, 1 RG
July 23: 1 BOF, 2 WG, 1 RG
July 27: 2 BOFs, 1 WG, 1 RG (final agenda - most slots had 8)
On the day: 2 BOFs, 2 WG, 1 RG (I think)

So it's not that they don't get scheduled there (which is what I thought at 
first), it's that they get moved out of there when people request it.

I think.

                         Harald


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email