IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Friday @ IETF61?

George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Thu, 02 September 2004 11:49 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA24640; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:49:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2q8L-0003od-RY; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:52:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2pzO-0000A9-LO; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:42:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2puk-00073d-AB for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:38:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA24020 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:38:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cumin.apnic.net ([202.12.29.59] helo=apnic.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2px3-0002t0-U6 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:40:30 -0400
Received: from apnic.net (durian.apnic.net [202.12.29.252]) by apnic.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i82Bbe8f000316; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:37:41 +1000
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 21:37:39 +1000
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
Message-Id: <20040902213739.5aca32cc@garlic.apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040902204150.36058f73@garlic.apnic.net>
References: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B3452@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> <20040902204150.36058f73@garlic.apnic.net>
Organization: APNIC Pty Ltd
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf)
X-Fruit-Of-The-Month-Club: persimmon
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AP-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.001 required=6
X-AP-Spam-Score: -100.001 (notspam) BAYES_44,USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.15 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ietf@ietf.org, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Friday @ IETF61?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:41:50 +1000 George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:36:39 +0300 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
>
>>I do not believe that this is achievable. With the majority of other standards organizations meetings and industry events building their schedules on a week basis, avoiding major conflicts in the participants calendars would become an even more challenging task, close to mission impossible.
>
>I do not believe this is true. 

actually, its been pointed out to me this is painfully true. There are also
loosers in re-scheduling. Some people will not benefit from my idea. Possibly
many people. bodies like IEEE do back-to-back scheduling. (sigh)
 
-George

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email