Re: draft-ietf-mhsds-subtrees-05, draft-ietf-mhsds-infotree-05, draft-ietf-mhsds-routdirectory-05

"Iain K. Hanson" <ihanson@pcs.dec.com> Fri, 08 July 1994 15:17 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04398; 8 Jul 94 11:17 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04388; 8 Jul 94 11:17 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09564; 8 Jul 94 11:17 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04374; 8 Jul 94 11:17 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04316; 8 Jul 94 11:14 EDT
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09484; 8 Jul 94 11:14 EDT
Received: from cssec4.pcs.dec.com by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/27May94) id AA08392; Fri, 8 Jul 94 08:06:21 -0700
Received: by cssec4.pcs.dec.com (5.57/jmh-inet-gw-v1.05); id AA12199; Fri, 8 Jul 94 17:06:07 +0200
Message-Id: <9407081506.AA12199@cssec4.pcs.dec.com>
To: Internet Engineering Task Force <ietf@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: ihanson@cssec4.pcs.dec.com
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mhsds-subtrees-05, draft-ietf-mhsds-infotree-05, draft-ietf-mhsds-routdirectory-05
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jul 94 10:04:08 EDT." <9407081404.AA24166@skidrow.lkg.dec.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 1994 17:06:07 +0200
X-Orig-Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Iain K. Hanson" <ihanson@pcs.dec.com>
X-Mts: smtp

"Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" wrote:

>I continue to fine the titles of these drafts to be misleading,

Whilst I am not sympathetic with the tone of this email, I do
agree with the above statement. I think it would make life a
lot easier if the word Directory was preceeded with 'X.500'.
Not least to help those using the RFC index before the chosing
which RFC's to download.

/ikh