Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Sun, 29 September 2002 22:07 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA09890; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 18:07:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id RAA20233 for ietf-outbound.09@loki.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA20205 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id RAA09554 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:38:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from mail.enyo.de (cygnus-ext.enyo.de [212.9.189.162]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA09550 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 17vljS-00075F-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:36:06 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 17vljc-0000l1-00; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:36:16 +0200
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Cc: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209231438210.2872-100000@netbusters.com> <23838.1032845786@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>, Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:36:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <23838.1032845786@munnari.OZ.AU> (Robert Elz's message of "Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:36:26 +0700")
Message-ID: <87n0q0h41b.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> writes:

> That wasn't done here, so the "officially withdrawn it" really can only be
> interpreted as "the authors are no longer pushing this doc".

The authors stopped pushing this document _only in the IETF context_.
However, the document is usually referenced by its
http://www.ietf.org/ URL. I think that's why the situation is so
confusing.