IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Thu, 26 December 2002 19:45 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA14730; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18RdyG-0001zK-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:47:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18RdyB-0001z0-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:47:03 -0500
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA14633 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:41:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.12.7.Beta0/8.12.7.Beta0) with ESMTP id gBQJiUb1006250; Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:44:30 -0500
Message-Id: <200212261944.gBQJiUb1006250@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: jasonc@science.org, cwysopal@atstake.com, coley@mitre.org, dee3@torque.pothole.com, ietf@ietf.org, kre@munnari.OZ.AU, info@knowngoods.org, Bruce Schneier <schneier@counterpane.com>, cert@cert.org, Clinton Kreitner <kreitner@home.com>, Alan Paller <AlanPaller@aol.com>, Hal Pomeranz <hal@deer-run.com>
Subject: Re: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 26 Dec 2002 20:35:34 +0100." <87y96cd14p.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <ILEPILDHBOLAHHEIMALBIEDAEHAA.jasonc@science.org> <200212261833.gBQIXCb1003620@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <87y96cd14p.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1209592738P"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:44:30 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 20:35:34 +0100, Florian Weimer said:

> There was quite a bit rejection, and some very profound criticism (the
> killer argument, IMHO, is that a large part of the industry does not
> accept _any_ disclosure at all).

Wander over to NANOG - a large(*) part of the ISP industry doesn't seem to think
that filtering RFC1918-space packets found on the public internet should
be filtered either.  Doesn't make it "right" in any sense of the term....

(*) large enough that some 30% of the traffic at the root nameservers is
from 1918 source addresses - and these packets never got filtered.

/Valdis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email