IETF Logo Mail Archive

Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Mon, 23 September 2002 18:03 UTC

Received: from loki.ietf.org (loki [10.27.2.29]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA18863 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:03:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from adm@localhost) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id OAA22354 for ietf-outbound.10@loki.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [10.27.2.28]) by loki.ietf.org (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA22325 for <ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:01:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id NAA18719 for ietf-mainout@loki.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: ietf.org: majordom set sender to owner-ietf@ietf.org using -f
Received: from mail.enyo.de (cygnus-ext.enyo.de [212.9.189.162]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18712 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 17tXW1-0000W0-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:01:01 +0200
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 17tXWB-0000jo-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:01:11 +0200
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Status of draft-christey-wysopal-vuln-disclosure-00.txt
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:01:11 +0200
Message-ID: <87n0q88u1k.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

At some point, the authors of this IETF draft have officially
withdrawn it, but this document is still being referenced a lot,
sometimes in contexts which might lead inexperienced readers to
believe that this draft is supported by the IETF.  It's even expired.

What's the status of the document, as far as the IETF is concerned?
Will it remain in the IETF archives forever?  Has the withdrawal been
withdrawn?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email