Re: HTTP/2 has been approved
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 19 February 2015 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEB01A1BC5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:32:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id su-xNtZcIaIG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBD31A0158 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (142-254-17-245.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.245]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t1JIWSGH038696 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:32:29 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 142-254-17-245.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.245] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 has been approved
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <D4E24112-71EA-498F-BCF1-A202E97B677C@ieca.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:32:28 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4CBAF0A-409B-4B45-B92E-CF148BF833B8@vpnc.org>
References: <96332FA9-9C09-4AD8-A76E-41593AA2652B@piuha.net> <20423.1424358980@sandelman.ca> <D4E24112-71EA-498F-BCF1-A202E97B677C@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MC-MLyxPoPWggSD8Yr4tWjvKpkI>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:32:36 -0000
On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:16, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > >> I propose that this document skip PS, and go straight to Internet Standard to >> accurately reflect the status of this document. > > Six months after it gets an RFC# I’d completely support this. Good god, no. HTTP/2 is quite complex, and it is likely that at least some parts will turn out to be non-optimal. Please give the HTTPBIS WG at least a year to shake out the protocol after wide deployment and constant use. Rushing the WG just so we can feel good about slapping a near-meaningless feel-good label on the spec is not a good process. Counter-proposal: we let the people closest to the protocol, the WG that created it, decide when to ask for STD status. --Paul Hoffman
- HTTP/2 has been approved Jari Arkko
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Michael Richardson
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Yoav Nir
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Phillip Hallam-Baker
- HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standard Michael Richardson
- Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standa… Yoav Nir
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Sean Turner
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Paul Hoffman
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Jari Arkko
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved David Morris
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved ned+ietf
- Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standa… Larry Masinter
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Julian Reschke
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Julian Reschke