Re: HTTP/2 has been approved
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 20 February 2015 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EB21A8786 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:12:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O8YX5sw-2Gee for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D01D11A049C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 07:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpbJm-1XsWdc3EAA-00fQJP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:12:14 +0100
Message-ID: <54E74EC8.7070807@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:12:08 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 has been approved
References: <96332FA9-9C09-4AD8-A76E-41593AA2652B@piuha.net> <20423.1424358980@sandelman.ca> <CAMm+LwhS2KtpQX3uR0yVtN5sNTtbU2CsGmburfFc9-iqGssC8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhS2KtpQX3uR0yVtN5sNTtbU2CsGmburfFc9-iqGssC8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:j55cVobr1gHhwsbRkkSSweqaIhgr/xhRSpD6diTzKwtZM7wpNVW 4CtKLTgFApDODgGK5nEZckdJc5ZTgdQBnN4dfxcXBP5ZKq1GXtPWNrOarsLb0EqFK0Gsx1y QCEE7df//kBwkR+TomhcsXPohMZJuTB0F7CIYkRwidQhNRTpNimBv+w/MQ9QNbViKVlFjBu BtAxS1jrYwl3mppi0+0hQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gG3F4TNfuk0qRog5q7OU_ghQPu8>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:12:24 -0000
On 2015-02-19 16:42, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > ... > HTTP/2 is really a maintenance effort on an existing IETF standard. Only > I don't think it ever got that status (would check the ietf.org > <http://ietf.org> site is down right now). > ... It seems that you are confusing the HTTP/1.1 revision documents (RFC 723*) with HTTP/2. Best regards, Julian
- HTTP/2 has been approved Jari Arkko
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Michael Richardson
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Yoav Nir
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Phillip Hallam-Baker
- HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standard Michael Richardson
- Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standa… Yoav Nir
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Sean Turner
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Paul Hoffman
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Jari Arkko
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved David Morris
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved ned+ietf
- Re: HTTP/2 should be published at Internet Standa… Larry Masinter
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Julian Reschke
- Re: HTTP/2 has been approved Julian Reschke