Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D9C12947A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dclepkv7JsC2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47014129489 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1OIaL5i003466; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:36:21 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B36620B9D1; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:36:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21E220B817; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:36:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1OIaKQa027063; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:36:20 +0100
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
References: <58AF313D.3020905@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2ymnLm9dUNL3doU9+vR0eMzGbr71HQybbibXq9rCObP3A@mail.gmail.com> <21A9AEAE-330D-47F3-88CA-FC845C71AED0@darou.fr> <CAKD1Yr2Q-AUEWQSXFPzjn73Q7dJhMpB2_iHb3wJTCGx4-==Bpg@mail.gmail.com> <DADB35F5-3CB6-4396-A99F-ECE13C3EFE44@darou.fr> <e89b23b0-b037-995e-fd66-335505ecee61@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaY6RzX6pGFFMcReADudt+ewVtNw_XUYp07_BAVKAp8+hQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd05771e-1b03-1ee7-2a4c-0a1fe69b8a14@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZJR9YzkF-R9Gx6MWBoJG4cSvp0rovYQ_9BALLzbQGiPQ@mail.gmail.com> <c3e04aa1-40e1-551f-3821-b62732106e3d@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZhAp3VWHBJh08XnFoFAHZ_69tQJyUVAXE_YP9ELaDhbA@mail.gmail.com> <e9edd389-9b84-21b0-644b-10cfc7ea7d4e@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaatbLHVrjwBh345G6F1jv+R+RtgOSvQdAACcRXRZnU1zQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b7b7f6b0-4c53-3baf-320b-0f7e443040f0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:36:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaatbLHVrjwBh345G6F1jv+R+RtgOSvQdAACcRXRZnU1zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/N3pMAhXM-ZQbA_XAlVQAXuA53zI>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:36:25 -0000


Le 24/02/2017 à 19:21, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Petrescu
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Le 24/02/2017 à 18:53, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>
>
>         yes, I think so.. for linux:
>         $ sudo ip -6 addr add 2001:700:4::1 dev em1
>
>         gets me:
>          inet6 2001:700:4::1/128 scope global
>
>
>     That address is good, but how about the routing table?  Does it get
>     an entry like 2001:700:4::/64?
>
>
> $ ifconfig em1
> <snip>
>           inet6 addr: 2001:700:4::1/128 Scope:Global
> <snip>
>
> and:
> $ netstat -rnA inet6
> Kernel IPv6 routing table
> Destination                    Next Hop                   Flag Met Ref
> Use If
> 2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         U    256 0
> 0 em1
> <snip>
> 2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         Un   0   1
> 0 lo
>
> that sure seems like i only got what I paid for.. on:
> $ uname -r
> 3.13.0-92-generic

Looks good in linux world.

Alex

>
>