IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C15129874 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aucdRlTbnH5o for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 717D512986D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id x35so18523131qtc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=FgtiRKPUP2xWJ0i/tZ1caU4SuBdbt8qpVuW/kwEi7c0=; b=i/xcYXZn0+OnrwO9LtLoq5XR8OYErGXLv8tFb2sxw38AjbwJQPof0Dd+zGlFSLakpo qfIBtLotArzbziJudjC2Q/Z7t3ozLFVqkSdNBgQDY5wnLrwjSf+sTCVxwgLhLGM6IH7k BYJtFA7+TsB1gG0AtjViCui1EnsyUkWC7bNXkRiDMGLcndrqKtmzggmYw0YBR43AzFBA uLIv5lnR7K/cthsIB7mIzQXB5woHstf7za1lfte2GpASXaNo1TNrDUtCVrP0avkAPXDL eCKGB2snm/n5ZrmQCx9ZIsMqkPNn9n4y5f2WBYI1qppT0bHpHSt23o1ysOe/fxPOZ5sI 0sxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FgtiRKPUP2xWJ0i/tZ1caU4SuBdbt8qpVuW/kwEi7c0=; b=qxr0kX+zekDiPq/qPTBarjJocdmg8PwJcAaMVwETL/oP5gTEfe9ePDq6PQmCFzDdLe 6wPihEFwH7wG0G4JJgMwZmSm6S6WW67VLfUDpQB4SpCb9/UwLuQIMyHP+BnUuFIqw12Z otGE/uTP1Gua1yxKXXdvOkH1fIgZd2HJRAex0MV7B8StaQ0X7uYI1mqmlBZjKuNyebHR 5Gp3qAOr3ZGJz+Qh+tXELk3uDy7i9Ym3+rBlzPHTUfJLygI2uzPRyTG16P2H4unzcyXX Uyh1PncA912UjsgYMmZmObQ43yBmjNhxzQBwmF4+YpHEfkK7ADwjBJs37qmLdpg5pNCs UiPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k+uuOXOCzwkbWrW3Ldf17rCSU52PrR96K/mrRCoiHWRI7W/2NW+aoMohR4yvWQiniM3kqXzMzvGFw42g==
X-Received: by 10.200.51.92 with SMTP id u28mr3184849qta.151.1487948387261; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.91.71 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:59:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e89b23b0-b037-995e-fd66-335505ecee61@gmail.com>
References: <58AF313D.3020905@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2ymnLm9dUNL3doU9+vR0eMzGbr71HQybbibXq9rCObP3A@mail.gmail.com> <21A9AEAE-330D-47F3-88CA-FC845C71AED0@darou.fr> <CAKD1Yr2Q-AUEWQSXFPzjn73Q7dJhMpB2_iHb3wJTCGx4-==Bpg@mail.gmail.com> <DADB35F5-3CB6-4396-A99F-ECE13C3EFE44@darou.fr> <e89b23b0-b037-995e-fd66-335505ecee61@gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:59:46 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hJhfCi9CKrld9KVr2NYXK2N5mzA
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaY6RzX6pGFFMcReADudt+ewVtNw_XUYp07_BAVKAp8+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113550ec116834054947fb11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/f88Unaz86P_Xa5X5AJj3N30ZL5I>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:59:50 -0000

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> A question to Windows is the following: what prefixlen does it set when
> the end user manually assigns an address on an interface without
> specifiying a prefixlen?
>
>
I don't think this matters... 'end users' will in almost all cases just
attach and get connectivity. If they are in a place where someone says:
"Hey, you should go if/ipconfig ...." then .. they are 'consenting adults'
and can do whatever they please.

again the proposed text (now 175+ messages back) really covers this
already..

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email