IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19BE129481 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m1Usi4UfDjUr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FB2712947F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x35so23329266qtc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=2yT5M/ALRD+D4tNfSC4AiTAPhnpitQ7iloZD6EtJgok=; b=ROnWnV4mIBs3NG6ch8H8CkOj5/UOfZlS60Azn5TxW4ktcVAi6X+h7v6kXOSAiYwuj/ TTRNn5YU2ztuqsCHUPwgLTc/+bhdYV4wt8HI8/I/iRlHcR+qUhT4fLM4HHFvzO2qhxTx DED6WpWFFkp+NdfWLbFbSOVa7wnSS00ndeagZddSLEBUvOKqnxxl1lurhm/OFdWDsXBL gd8/PWDCA4MbLlK8TRplfLRBkbwcc7Sz0+DM5+6RyhhR69F5JNe5nkQVpMDYnjEkM9Sh +vZ7jmnvy1ZK8+F/dHL91m07kZgknZRMWij84yYcQRgPbloW82aAvohADk/7JbxqpRn/ mIlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2yT5M/ALRD+D4tNfSC4AiTAPhnpitQ7iloZD6EtJgok=; b=S8REkc+2rCTIXG4C0dAkDcXJ0HCzpgGPWwXJMG2rb9uCejo8am3bgr4t+xO8jmaDX/ eKuwEJGggX9hHh8/nhYXavCUJ2iQAkBtOW6sHy9WWco1eK/1ShEt+oxvmwvSmZcAECy2 ZwzUyefoYxc/RryXtiYLQL0YF5AGDnauNAy2FGD8E0xVJmt9CZ4q8L2AlJs0D3w1jgkr H/2vp0j7r+nD2k0yvyb/ImwcU04sWETfBTv4L1cFsqezYqBrvfsFK0x0C9/JEMZcsC42 U2+IYraPkmojpjRf1tEkJzy7b5ahBJi4MMx4vaRve6Adj7hREM21INX6TbCq8wJorEcI XBJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l4V6ujFemIo5j739HG+lUJKwEDBCNR+5Siwr5VORFQS56DE9yVmsDKqdxjgWbEOo9NQxOwjqfELupVlQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.51.19 with SMTP id t19mr4059171qta.242.1487960477678; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.91.71 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:21:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e9edd389-9b84-21b0-644b-10cfc7ea7d4e@gmail.com>
References: <58AF313D.3020905@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2ymnLm9dUNL3doU9+vR0eMzGbr71HQybbibXq9rCObP3A@mail.gmail.com> <21A9AEAE-330D-47F3-88CA-FC845C71AED0@darou.fr> <CAKD1Yr2Q-AUEWQSXFPzjn73Q7dJhMpB2_iHb3wJTCGx4-==Bpg@mail.gmail.com> <DADB35F5-3CB6-4396-A99F-ECE13C3EFE44@darou.fr> <e89b23b0-b037-995e-fd66-335505ecee61@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaY6RzX6pGFFMcReADudt+ewVtNw_XUYp07_BAVKAp8+hQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd05771e-1b03-1ee7-2a4c-0a1fe69b8a14@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZJR9YzkF-R9Gx6MWBoJG4cSvp0rovYQ_9BALLzbQGiPQ@mail.gmail.com> <c3e04aa1-40e1-551f-3821-b62732106e3d@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZhAp3VWHBJh08XnFoFAHZ_69tQJyUVAXE_YP9ELaDhbA@mail.gmail.com> <e9edd389-9b84-21b0-644b-10cfc7ea7d4e@gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:21:17 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1OSXzUZb-8sFAVSdSJi4jdiluck
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaatbLHVrjwBh345G6F1jv+R+RtgOSvQdAACcRXRZnU1zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11403ccab665c805494acbca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n48194dlZ-Ot3b0msvZGFZH6Wvg>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:21:20 -0000

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Le 24/02/2017 à 18:53, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>
>>
>> yes, I think so.. for linux:
>> $ sudo ip -6 addr add 2001:700:4::1 dev em1
>>
>> gets me:
>>  inet6 2001:700:4::1/128 scope global
>>
>
> That address is good, but how about the routing table?  Does it get an
> entry like 2001:700:4::/64?
>
>
$ ifconfig em1
<snip>
          inet6 addr: 2001:700:4::1/128 Scope:Global
<snip>

and:
$ netstat -rnA inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination                    Next Hop                   Flag Met Ref Use
If
2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         U    256 0     0
em1
<snip>
2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         Un   0   1     0
lo

that sure seems like i only got what I paid for.. on:
$ uname -r
3.13.0-92-generic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email