Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets

Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr> Fri, 24 February 2017 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6927F1294DC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:26:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYBPCLojIBM2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD251294DA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:26:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id v1OJQVq4003415; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:26:31 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 97B9F20BAF8; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:26:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889D120B9E7; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:26:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.80] ([132.166.84.80]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v1OJQUIG017800; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:26:30 +0100
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis prohibiting non-/64 subnets
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
References: <58AF313D.3020905@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2ymnLm9dUNL3doU9+vR0eMzGbr71HQybbibXq9rCObP3A@mail.gmail.com> <21A9AEAE-330D-47F3-88CA-FC845C71AED0@darou.fr> <CAKD1Yr2Q-AUEWQSXFPzjn73Q7dJhMpB2_iHb3wJTCGx4-==Bpg@mail.gmail.com> <DADB35F5-3CB6-4396-A99F-ECE13C3EFE44@darou.fr> <e89b23b0-b037-995e-fd66-335505ecee61@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaY6RzX6pGFFMcReADudt+ewVtNw_XUYp07_BAVKAp8+hQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd05771e-1b03-1ee7-2a4c-0a1fe69b8a14@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZJR9YzkF-R9Gx6MWBoJG4cSvp0rovYQ_9BALLzbQGiPQ@mail.gmail.com> <c3e04aa1-40e1-551f-3821-b62732106e3d@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZhAp3VWHBJh08XnFoFAHZ_69tQJyUVAXE_YP9ELaDhbA@mail.gmail.com> <e9edd389-9b84-21b0-644b-10cfc7ea7d4e@gmail.com> <CAL9jLaatbLHVrjwBh345G6F1jv+R+RtgOSvQdAACcRXRZnU1zQ@mail.gmail.com> <b7b7f6b0-4c53-3baf-320b-0f7e443040f0@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre PETRESCU <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>
Organization: CEA
Message-ID: <81bc136f-b209-2a62-850b-a6b6f4745887@cea.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:26:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b7b7f6b0-4c53-3baf-320b-0f7e443040f0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms060404050807090606000906"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZGAn1ZFYorwO-sbKUdS5imsjGNk>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:26:37 -0000

--
Alexandre Petrescu
alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr, tél 0169089223

Le 24/02/2017 à 19:36, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
>
>
> Le 24/02/2017 à 19:21, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Petrescu
>> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     Le 24/02/2017 à 18:53, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
>>
>>
>>         yes, I think so.. for linux:
>>         $ sudo ip -6 addr add 2001:700:4::1 dev em1
>>
>>         gets me:
>>          inet6 2001:700:4::1/128 scope global
>>
>>
>>     That address is good, but how about the routing table?  Does it get
>>     an entry like 2001:700:4::/64?
>>
>>
>> $ ifconfig em1
>> <snip>
>>           inet6 addr: 2001:700:4::1/128 Scope:Global
>> <snip>
>>
>> and:
>> $ netstat -rnA inet6
>> Kernel IPv6 routing table
>> Destination                    Next Hop                   Flag Met Ref
>> Use If
>> 2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         U 256 0
>> 0 em1
>> <snip>
>> 2001:700:4::1/128              ::                         Un 0   1
>> 0 lo
>>
>> that sure seems like i only got what I paid for.. on:
>> $ uname -r
>> 3.13.0-92-generic
>
> Looks good in linux world.
>
> Alex

But, I would like to add that last time I checked (january 2015) the 
linux kernel complained in /var/log/messages  when receiving an RA 
containing a plen 65.  It called it "illegal" prefix length.
That RA was sent over usbnet.  There is no specification of 
IPv6-over-USB, there is no IID length requirement to be 64, because 
there is noo USB IEEE MAC address.

That was wrong at that time (call a 65 in RA "illegal"), I dont know 
whether it still the case.  I may check in some time in the following 
weeks, and this is the question I will follow: is the linux kernel 
complaining when receiving an RA with a plen 65 on usbnet?  If yes, then 
linux stilll has at least one problem with this 64.

What is sure is that there is still no IPv6-over-USB draft, so no IID 64 
on USB.

It's  a similar situation with cellular links instead of USB - no spec, 
but hidden assumptions about it being 64.  They are all wrong.

Alex

>
>>
>>