IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 14 May 2020 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1403f52c4b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B6C3A0D95 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9gTpD7vVqbl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211DD3A0D8D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 15:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1589493627; x=1590098427; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=iTMuBc+6 ufUz0WMBzsuPRV2MLiqQtFa43Tg0oi8B4wY=; b=U7jmY6Qu14haqT6C8bpoq9Pi 64LuSl1rCHIaPTglD5PXmGP7a40WgNNYqQ2gH4Dw8MxkEeiSA+7spEAD7/EdniF/ G4fwkNBRKRDYvLf9VwCZqroJRvgz6ExrEfcx28xNCelG+nX6Q3pzqCThuwr3Bbpd vMCX/1mGHjwDc9acufs=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:27 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:26 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.130] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000162167.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:26 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:992b:f3e3:fc5f:4f79
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.130]
X-MDArrival-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:26 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1403f52c4b=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:00:24 +0200
Subject: Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <DD91A5DF-97CB-4D15-A182-09973E111441@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: IETF 108 will be an online meeting
References: <83D4CBCE-E464-4CCC-8679-592531EF7448@ietf.org> <982E1F5E-83C0-4EE7-8826-67C872893F6E@consulintel.es> <m2blmqtceu.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2blmqtceu.wl-randy@psg.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ONOPVAx68GQzrRQI7BEd4MZ_K2g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 22:00:32 -0000

Hi Randy,

Tks, it is a matter of responsibility, but I'm sure that we will be back here very soon!

I was not in agreement with the decision taken for the Vancouver meeting, but mainly because the way it was taken and the timing. The situation after several months, proven much worst and somehow being "inside" the "problem" also offers a different perspective.

Also, my worries now aren't IETF108 anymore, but many close meetings and how bad governments are protecting us and creating a bas social and economic situation for millions of people.

I don't want to open a "political debate" here and will *not* respond to this in the list, however I can't' avoid saying that I wrote an article (4 parts) with my views a few weeks ago ... so here is the link to the first part, for those interested in reading (and sharing!):
https://jordipalet.blogspot.com/2020/04/covid-19-governments-responsibility.html#en



Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 14/5/20 23:49, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> escribió:

    it is very brave of you to staunchly advocate the safe position after
    all these years of work.  thank you.

    randy



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email