IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 15 May 2020 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19003A08EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFvc021BKEO0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com (mail-oi1-f175.google.com [209.85.167.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2323A08DB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id o24so1141942oic.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wRI2dR/hiUeUXoM1gApI7ZZTBVKtcHE+IogClFCRl94=; b=f02l0JjJ0//dgtxlofFcFGvf9+hGYsNz393BsWx+MCS8NXe8ADzMTIiqE0yM+gI38c IZ9ax7dFLcvyRc3LX0/Ql1XER78XDGdlyfDJZwlvWSIvA6K/HUltwBH3bfG5mNlQDx+i stoKxv3WLRsOvKgmPwaaQQ0TfucXBRGoxJbSSlPe1GP4gRK80Hlop9Qxbp5H9P/CyK9y I9yiOOmyW4rBsTGA+zbaGg9NShIm2x3Tk/U3VAS/Eqkbt+p9jc9XbFpIxyBA0Wx0hPVP DOe7X08o0dPIQvm6lvOjBi0JQUSWDSc7e/d9Cjt3P/VnCktQ9gVHLWey7TY/uiRgrEwJ Zzdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hCCP68TD0QfYZ+qHym/onPQXQp2UyyYaKY53fNwp0W7vifGwI Ycn09Qem46TBsJk6h4Stclb9cuHxZwgcWdjQLtk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqxrIENWs/yyhY4rQlGjTzQEFzVCEkW0zMjtMU4YebxYDB67DRuhl0FmL522uOTFzhawj/N+ooBgQ4Mo+LbDg=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:5243:: with SMTP id g64mr849604oib.90.1589516970519; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <83D4CBCE-E464-4CCC-8679-592531EF7448@ietf.org> <982E1F5E-83C0-4EE7-8826-67C872893F6E@consulintel.es> <4956152a-6a6d-e993-592c-6c99e9415545@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4956152a-6a6d-e993-592c-6c99e9415545@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 00:29:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwgt-RroYabsyeycSR1A3Ro4NkJa0GqmksaoXzWuLVRRHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 108 will be an online meeting
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064730605a5a8428f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/fyRgV84zADRxHlkcWDQoNgp1NS0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 04:29:33 -0000

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:36 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 14/05/2020 22:40, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> >
> > this was a very sad decision from my side
> > (many of you know that it took 20 years for me and lot of persistent
> > effort, to get IETF108 in Madrid!),
> My sympathies! Even if I didn't like Madrid (I do), I would
> now, for this reason alone, be keen for us to have an IETF
> meeting in Madrid as soon as we can. Fairness is fine
> in more than the transport layer, and I think it'd only be
> fair for those of us who pick venues to recognise the years
> of effort upended by the cancellation. (Which is a good bit
> worse than Vancouver, us having met there a few times.)
>
> Cheers and hoping we all meet soon,
> S.
>

This might be appropriate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsM_VmN6ytk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email